The Eucharist God Doctrine or Egyptian "cookie god" (Similar to Communion or The Lord's Supper)

Ministers and churches in courts of law are considered wards of  the state by virtue of their 501c3 charter, including all church members 
          (adults and children). 

What's wrong with a non-profit tax-exempt status for a church denomination?

Inline image 2# 1: You CANNOT tell the truth because if you do you WILL be shut down and your assets confiscated by the IRS because you

will have VIOLATED your contract you signed with the IRS -and
the IRS comes not only after the "government" entity but after it's
officers and members as well to collect the "back taxes" owed
clear back to the original filing for a 501c3 tax status.

It really comes down to "greed". Churches never needed to file for a 501c3 tax status in the first place. But to create a state owned entity - a NEW ORGANIZATION, our religion would be "CHANGED" to adopt churchcraft and statecraft = truth mixed with error = back to the Tree of knowledge of good and evil. 

501c3 organizations are helplessly trapped today, if you want to "keep" all your assets you better keep your mouth sewed shut about Bible TRUTHS or the IRS will confiscate your assets retroactive back to the original filing date - and for the GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS - THIS DATE WOULD BE 1936 AND 1950. LOT'S OF PROPERTIES AND BACK TAXES WOULD BE OWED IF THEY DON'T KEEP THEIR MOUTH SHUT ABOUT THE THREE ANGEL'S MESSAGES WHICH ARE REALLY THREE ANTI-POPE MESSAGES...THE THIRD ANGEL'S MESSAGE IS ABOUT THE SABBATH AND NOT COMING TO THE SAME MIND OR SAME TEACHINGS AS THE BEAST OF REVELATION 14:6-12.


In 1968 SDA we joined a significant part of the World Council of Churches called "WORLD CONFESSIONAL FAMILIES": Pastor John Osborne with special guest Bob Trefz exposes the Jesuit plot to infiltrate the churches under the General Conference 501c3 NEW ENTITY Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists (the Conference, the Structure EIN# 52-0643036), and destroy the churches through ecumenicism: You can look them up in Guidestar.com a search engine for 501c3 non-profit tax exempt government agencies. Yes, the General Conference Seventh Day Adventist EIN # 52-0643036 IS A GOVERNMENT AGENCY! 

Don't miss this! This was recorded in 1991! It is SO MUCH WORSE TODAY:

Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QxywTIZ3xg 
Part 2: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FexSmYSMlL0 promoted ecumenism. SDA church now belongs to the "World Confessional Families" that the Catholic Church belongs to, and called  "Christian World Communions".

Inline image 1What are some reasons the IRS would confiscate properties to
collect back taxes owed retroactive to your filing for a non-profit,
tax-exempt status?


# 1 Discrimination against a "minority" group. You agreed in your application for a 501c3 not to discriminate against a FEDERALLY DETERMINED minority group. Women would be a minority group. If you believe the Bible and believe the Word of God is true and to be obeyed....a woman cannot be a ordained minister. Not that she cannot teach or have a sermon once in a while, but NOT to be ordained. Ellen White did not and was not ever an ordained minister.

# 2 if you believe it is wrong for Eve to marry Eve or Adam to marry Adam or just co-habitat....because of the Bible...then if you discriminate against the LBGTQ community - your tax status will be revoked, retroactive to the filing date for the tax status a 501c3 provides. [February 20, 1936, January 6, 1950 for Adventists]

# 3 if you believe the Bible and don't think people should just live together before getting hitched, or that adultery or fornication are sin, or that smoking is sin because it defiles your temple and is considered open sin, if you discriminate against this group, your 501c3 tax status can be revoked and you will owe back taxes back to your filing date for a 501c3 tax status.

# 4 You are NOT to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. You need a "church" or "Pope" to be your go between....if you believe the Bible... the Bible is soon to be banned again... 




The Government owns and runs your Church and its Doctrines! Most churches in America are organized as 501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations. The First Amendment clearly states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". To read the Bill Of Right, Click Here. You see, anything that the US Government deems “legal” can’t be spoken of unfavorably by “churches” desiring to keep the sacred exemption of Mister 501c3. It is more important to hold onto that earthly “pearl-of-great price” than to seek the heavenly one. The church is NOT supposed to be part of the Government or answerable to it.


Ephesians 5:24-25 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. 25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

(We see that Christ is the head of the church (congregation) not man.)

The Eucharist god Doctrine 
The Eucharist Doctrine Claims To Be Christ Incarnate, It Helps To Preserve You From Future Sins And It Helps The Dead. All churches and organizations have agreed to this doctrine when applying and being approved for a non-profit, tax except status a 501c3 provided by the IRS.


Does partaking of the Eucharist have power to cleanse Catholics, or all Denominational or organizational members who have agreed to this Eucharist doctrine who have been approved for their non-profit, 501c3 tax exempt status, given by the IRS, from sins? 

How to be a good IRS (debt collector for the Federal Reserve banks = the Pope of Rome) approved church and pastor:

It is now a fact that in order to get and keep the tax-exempt status a church must agree that all religions are equal
Inline image 1 (One World Religion = Catholic = universally accepted because of their baptism into the Trinity of Gods). The new Application for Recognition of Exemption Form 1023 Schedule A for Churches (Rev. September 1998) demands a declaration to this effect with the following words at point #3: "Does the organization require prospective members to renounce other religious beliefs or their membership in other churches or religious orders to become members? Yes__ No__. If "Yes," describe."


Inline image 1


It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out where they are going with this. In order to be considered a legal church (tax exempt) in America, the church or religious organization will have to declare that all religions are equal. They will also have to declare that they do not believe that their doctrinal position only results in converts to their faith having eternal life. They must renounce this narrow inclusivist position. Maybe we now know why Billy Graham, Robert Schuller, Pat Robertson, and other TV preachers have been making such fuzzy remarks about adherents of other religions, though sincere, going to heaven without receiving Christ.

“By virtue of their valid baptism, and their belief in Christ’s divinity and in the doctrine of the Trinity, Seventh-Day Adventists are both ontologically and theologically Christians. But Christians, once separated from the Church our Lord founded, are susceptible to being "tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine" (Eph. 4:14).” Catholic Answers on Seventh-Day Adventists, (current as of 2011). More on why Baptism into a "trinity of gods" is wrong here.

Freedom of curosity and freedom of knowledge. If modern SDA teaches people to see this kind of thing (the truth about the Eucharist) there would not be any members left in the SDA church. This remark, is of course, far from stupid, and it's implications are far reaching. It's obvious that tight censorship or exposure of Laodcians/SDA members from Historical SDA pioneer beliefs is a necessity in any modern war against losing its members.

The need to keep people in the dark about SDA plans is huge. People are asleep! Laodicean! Foolish virgins. It is  valuable to conceal the truth to those a church wants to mislead. To supplant error for truth. It's the devil's way from the beginning. But it's also necessary to keep the TRUTH BEFORE THE PEOPLE! If you are trained that no matter what the SDA church does it is going thru to the end...just like the Jews believed they were God's Chosen people until the end.... IF in the absence of censorship people might learn to be critical or to know the truth. 

My point is this: If you are trained to be uncrital of the SDA church, you can easily go just a little bit further, and learn to be uncrital of government, and of authority and of all established and received institutions. The result is of course the DEATH OF THE MIND. The transformation of the higher learning in independent scholarship into a cheering section for whatever popular notions and supersitions prevail at the moment.

IS YOUR CARNAL MIND DEAD TO THE TRUTH?

Have You Received A MIND Transplant From Christ? 

With a new hope the sin sick man looks upon Jesus. The expression of His Countenance, the tones of His voiceare like no otherLove and power seem to breathe from His very Presence. The sin-cripple's faith takes hold upon Christ's Word. Without question he sets his will to obey, and, as he does this, his whole body responds!

Salvation is simple. It is so simple that none be lost except those who refuse to “be saved in God’s own appointed way.”  Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 2, p. 445.

Yet salvation is also splendid. It is a mind transplant. And this means exactly what it says. It is not a mind bypass but a mind transplant. The carnal mind must be excised. Ezekiel 36:26.

Our carnal minds are so corrupt, defiled, and desperately wicked that they must be surgically removed by the sword of God’s Spirit.

In order for us to be saved we must unconditionally accept TWO priceless gifts:

1)      We must accept the free gift of Christ’s sacrificed life to pay the price for our sins. Yet Christ’s dying and death on the cross is not enough to save us from sin. We must accept yet another priceless gift of love.

2)      We must accept Christ’s very own mind that we may live His life of victory over sin.

The apostle Paul clearly understood both of these equally important aspects of salvations. He writes:

1)      “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.” Galations 2:20.

2)      Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:” Philippians 2:5. The original language clearly shows that this is to be the very same mind as Christ’s mind, his very own attitudes, his very own thoughts.

This is indeed the mystery or secret of Godly living. Unless Christ’s holy mind can control our unholy flesh we cannot have His love, joy, peace, happiness, victory or salvation.

SDA Church uses Catholic term "Eucharist" to describe communion bread
  • "The purpose of this essay is primarily to show how Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the eucharist or the Lord's supper...[and] to highlight Adventist understanding and practice of the eucharist...  "In preparation for the celebration of the eucharist Seventh-day Adventists practice the washing of feet..." Churches Respond to Baptism,Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 341-343, 1985. (This is the SDA churchs' official response to the ecumenical meeting they were a part of at the Faith and Order Conference of the World Council of Churches of January, 1982 in Lima, Peru).
  •  --The Eucharist is also called the "central celebration of the Christian church" (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 341). (Notice they captilize the "Eucharist" in the same way Rome does to depict a "living presence" within the bread.)
  •  --The church also states; "On occasion Seventh-day Adventists refer to the eucharist as a sacrament" (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342).
  • --The church also state that SDA's are "conscious of the sacredness of the celebration of the eucharist" (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342). (Here they use the Catholic term "celebration" when speakign of the eucharist. The term "celebration" was also used by Rome when they would kill Christians.)
  • "And we could go on if space permitted--to mention the WCC's... accentuation of the Holy Spirit and the Eucharist. All of these emphases fit into the ambit of the three angels' messages." Adventist Review, May 2, 1991, p 10.
"Dr. Samuel Bacchiocchi, the first non-Catholic to graduate from the Pontifical Gregorian Univ. in Rome, Italy, will hold a Lord's Day Seminar...the Pontifical Gregorian Univ., a prestigious Jesuit University. Bacchiocchi...was awarded a gold medal donated by Pope Paul VI..."Recorder, Mar 17, 1986, p 17-18.

NOTE: Does the pope bless heretics? Bacchiocchi (deceased) was a SDA teacher at Andrews Univ.

In Lima, Peru over 100 theologians met in Jan. 1982 to discuss unity of doctrine regarding Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry. They all "recommended unanimously" an agreed statement on these three doctrines for the "official response of the churches." Represented were "virtually all the major church traditions; Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Old Catholic, Lutheran, Anglican, Reformed, Methodist, United, Disciples, Baptist, Adventist and Pentecostal." WCC Faith and Order Paper, #111, 1982 (Back page).

"SDA's Staff Booth at Eucharistic Congress." Adventist Review, Feb 6, 1986, p 29.

------------------------- more here
To: Margaret Murray Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: The events in France. 15th February 2012
Thank you for your email.  Yes, I can confirm that the move for changing our God’s given name of Seventh Day Adventist is about to change for Catholic Apostolic Church, following a conversation that I had last Sunday with one of an influential and genuine Seventh day Adventist brothers from France. Apparently there will be other changes: the Lord’s Supper for instance, will be called, the Eucharist,  while the Sabbath school will be called: the Catechism.   As you can see all these new names are from Catholic derivation. It is believed also from  Adventist official sources, that  a meeting will be held shortly on this issue with Pentecostal, Evangelical, and Adventist representatives in America in a top secret location, as the Adventist leaders do not want the church members to know anything about such a move until things are done and settled. This is what I was told.  While the devil is seeking actively to destroy our churches, let us never forget that our Lord is in control of every situation and the devil will not prevail. God bless. 
-----------------------
--The Beast, being Roman Catholicism (Revelation 13:1-8, Daniel 7:8-14, 20-21, 24-27, 8:9-14, 23-25, GC 438-50, 7BC 972), with the foundation of this church being the Trinity of gods... The Eucharist--a most "blasphemous" and "heaven-insulting heresy" (4SOP 63).  Also the Pope and the Catholic system as Anti-christ (GC 142-43, TM 37), and our duty is to expose him and the papacy (Ev 233, 1SM 196). 

What about the Eucharist being blasphemous and heaven-insulting?
     "The purpose of this essay is primarily to show how Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the eucharist or the Lord's supper...[and] to highlight Adventist understanding and practice of the eucharist...
     "In preparation for the celebration of the eucharist Seventh-day Adventists practice the washing of feet..." Churches Respond to BEM(Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry), vol 2 (2BEM), p 341-343, 1985. (This is the SDA churchs' official response to the ecumenical meeting they were a part of at the Faith and Order Conference of the World Council of Churches (WCC) of January, 1982 in Lima, Peru).

     The Eucharist is also called by the SDA church as being the "central celebration of the Christian church" (2BEM 341).  The church also states; "On occasion Seventh-day Adventists refer to the eucharist as a sacrament" (2BEM 342).  They also state that SDA's are "conscious of the sacredness of the celebration of the eucharist" (2BEM 342).
     Then appears this amazing declaration:
     "And we could go on if space permitted--to mention the WCC's... accentuation of the Holy Spirit and the Eucharist.  All of these emphasesfit into the ambit of the three angels' messages." AR May 2, 1991, p 10.

     What about the warning against the Beast or Catholicism?
     "Although it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint...that attitude on the church's part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative protestant denominations in the early part of this century and the latter part of the last, and which has now been consigned to the historical trash heap so far as the Seventh-day Adventist church is concerned." EEOC vs PPPA Civ #74-2025 CBR, Reply Brief for Defendants, p 4.

     "...our work is not to denounce the Roman Catholic Church." PUR February 18, 1985, p 4.

     What about the Pope as being Anti-christ?
     "...if he was taught that the Pope is the anti-christ, I think that would be a misunderstanding.  I don't feel that's what we as a church believe....
     "...[the anti-christ], that's not a person.  That's not an individual..." Kenneth Cox, WTGL TV interview, February 8, 1993.

     What about the Catholic system as Anti-christ?
     The anti-christ is not referred to as "the papacy," because the Catholic church has "defended belief in Christ's fleshly nature" (AR October 27, 1983, p 7).  But the Anti-christ is referred to as being:
-- "former christians" (SOT September, 1990, p 25).
-- "a mind-set" (SOT September, 1990, p 26).
-- those who teach "false doctrine qualify" (AR October 27, 1983, p 7).
-- those who "draw us away from our commitment to Christ" (SOT September, 1990, p 26).
-- those who "deny that Jesus is the Christ or the Messiah" (SOT September, 1990, p 25). [Hence the Devil and all his angels cannot be anti-christ either (Matt 8:29, Mark 1;24, Luke 4:34)!]
     What about the Lamb-like Beast being the United States?
     The Lamb-like Beast is not referred to as being the USA, but is vaguely referred to as being "an idol-making power" (AR October 15, 1992, p 10).  Or referred to as "the antispirit" (AR September 7, 1989, p 22-23).

"Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" (Galatians 4:16)

WHY IS THE EUCHARIST A BAD THING? Read on to find out: 

Beware: Do not Celebrate the Eucharist--a most "blasphemous" and "Heaven-insulting heresy." 4SOP 63. 

"The Scriptural ordinance of the Lord’s Supper had been supplanted by the idolatrous sacrifice of the mass. Papal priests pretended, by their senseless mummery, to convert the simple bread and wine into the actual “body and blood of Christ.”—Cardinal Wiseman, The Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Blessed Eucharist, Proved From Scripture, lecture 8, sec. 3, par. 26. With blasphemous presumption, they openly claimed the power of creating God, the Creator of all things. Christians were required, on pain of death, to avow their faith in this horrible, Heaven-insulting heresy. Multitudes who refused were given to the flames." (See Appendix.) THE GREAT CONTROVERSY, PAGE 59

What about the Eucharist being blasphemous and heaven-insulting?
     "The purpose of this essay is primarily to show how Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the Eucharist or the Lord's supper...[and] to highlight Adventist understanding and practice of the Eucharist...

     "In preparation for the celebration of the Eucharist Seventh-day Adventists practice the washing of feet..." Churches Respond to BEM(Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry), vol 2 (2BEM), p 341-343, 1985. (This is the SDA churchs' official response to the ecumenical meeting they were a part of at the Faith and Order Conference of the World Council of Churches (WCC) of January, 1982 in Lima, Peru).

     The Eucharist is also called by the SDA church as being the "central celebration of the Christian church" (2BEM 341).  The church also states; "On occasion Seventh-day Adventists refer to the Eucharist as a sacrament" (2BEM 342).  They also state that SDA's are "conscious of the sacredness of the celebration of the Eucharist" (2BEM 342).  (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342). 

Then appears this amazing declaration:
     "And we could go on if space permitted--to mention the WCC's... accentuation of the Holy Spirit and the Eucharist.  All of these emphases fit into the ambit of the three angels' messages." AR May 2, 1991, p 10.


See the actual application to apply for the tax status or "government entity" a 501c3 non-profit status provides:

Keep in mind, if you try to encourage people to RENOUNCE OTHER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS like Sunday Worship, Immortality of the Soul, Eucharist god worship, you are discriminating...also be SURE not to encourage your members HOW they should vote... if you are Adventist, you should NOT vote at ALL!

"Does the organization require prospective members to renounce other religious beliefs or their membership in other churches or religious orders to become members? Yes__ No__. If "Yes," describe."

  1. Form 1023 (Rev. June 2006)

    www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1023.pdf
    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
    Recognition of Exemption Under Section ... For purposes of this schedule....Complete Parts I - XI of Form 1023 and submit only those Schedules (A through. H) that ...... 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i)—a church or a convention or association of ...
  2. Publication 557 (10/2011), Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization

    www.irs.gov/publications/p557/ch03.html
    1023 Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the .....Churches, interchurch organizations of local units of a church, conventions or ..... of tax-exempt status must supply the IRS (on Schedule B, Form 1023) with the ...
  3. Application for Recognition of Exemption

    www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=96109,00.html
    Jan 30, 2012 – To apply for recognition by the IRS of exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, use Form 1023, Application for Recognition of Exemption, and its ... Except for churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and public charities ...
  4. IRS Church Tax-Exempt Status

    www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1702880/posts
    Sep 16, 2006 – Recognition by the IRS or incorporation of a 'church' is not required. [For clarification ... Click here to print IRS Form 1023Schedule A, Page 13 ...

Circular breads (cakes) were offered also to Nimrod’s wife (who represents the "Dove" or "God the Holy Spirit" in the Trinity or Tritheism (Tritheism is the teaching that the Godhead is really three separate beings forming three separate gods) doctrine), the Queen of Heaven in Babylon. Nimrod and his wife fled to Egypt after the tower of Babel failure. People in Egypt worshipped sun and on the altars of Egypt were circular sun shaped wafers made from unleavened bread. Egyptians priests prayed above these wafers, to make them as holy. This bread represented the body of sun god and in middle were initialing IHS (Isis, Horus, Seb, Egyptian trinity). Then they told to the people, that miracle had taken place. They said that wafers have changed for the flesh of sun god Osiris and after it the nation ate its god. This Egyptian bread god ritual points out perfectly Roman Catholic Church Eucharist, in which catholic priests changes wafer for Jesus Christ. The Roman Catholic Church's roots in Eucharist are in heathen religions and not in the teachings of the Bible.

Because the Roman catholic Church has adopted a pagan sun worshiping ritual in an attempt to unite pagans and christians, so the IHS letters are "dedicated" also to Egyptian trinity. Pagan Rome worshipped Isis, Horus, and Seb. The round disk wafer IHS symbol of Isis, Horus, Seb, was eaten as food for the soul.  This was integrated into Christianity as the wafer used in the Eucharist, and is round with IHS engraved on it, or a cross symbol.  This pagan Trinity of Isis, Horus, Seb; is represented by IHS which was then made the Christogram for another “Jesus Christ”. "For if he that cometh preacheth “another” Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive “another” spirit, which ye have not received, or “another” gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear (be on guard) with him." 2 Corinthians 11:4

“For this reason the Eucharist cannot unite us to Christ (and those members of denominations that have a 501c3 status in the US) without at the same time cleansing us from past sins and preserving us from future sins.” –{RCC Catechism, Pg. 351, #1393}

“By the same charity that it enkindles in us, the Eucharist (and those members of denominations that have a 501c3 status in the US) preserves us from future mortal sins.” –{RCC Catechism, Pg. 352, #1395}

     “...the Eucharist cannot unite us to Christ without at the same time cleansing us from past sins and preserving us from future sins... (and those members of denominations that have a 501c3 status in the US) If, as often as his blood is poured out, it is poured for the forgiveness of sins, I should always receive it, so that it may always forgive my sins. Because I always sin, I should always have a remedy.” —{St. Ambrose, De Sacr. 4, 6, 28: PL 16, 446; cf. 1 Cor 11:26.]" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, Section Two, Chapter One, Article 3, Subsection VI, #1393. http://www.christusrex.org/www1/CDHN/euch2.html#BANQUET).}

“The sacrificial character of the Eucharist is manifested in the very words of institution (and those members of denominations that have a 501c3 status in the US): 'This is my body which is given for you' and 'This cup which is poured out for you is the New Covenant in my blood.' In the Eucharist Christ gives us the very body which he gave up for us on the cross, the very blood which he 'poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.'...

     “Through the ministry of priests the spiritual sacrifice of the faithful is completed in union with the sacrifice of Christ the only Mediator, which in the Eucharist is offered through the priests' hands in the name of the whole Church in an unbloody and sacramental manner until the Lord himself comes....

     “In the most blessed sacrament of the Eucharist ‘the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ and, therefore, the whole Christ is truly, really, and substantially contained.’  ‘... it is presence in the fullest sense: that is to say, it is a substantial presence by which Christ, God and man, makes himself wholly and entirely present.’...

     “The Eucharistic presence of Christ Catholics (and those members of denominations that have a 501c3 status in the US) begins at the moment of the consecration and endures as long as the Eucharistic species subsist [thus fully under the control of and discretion of the priest]. Christ is present whole and entire in each of the species and whole and entire in each of their parts...

Who is a heretic you might ask? See Acts 24:12. If you are NOT Catholic or NOT a trinity believer, then YOU are a heretic according to Rome. Just as Jesus and His disciples were considered "HERITICS" or a "SECT" see Acts 24:14...and read Acts for the word "sect" or click here to find these verses: 
https://sites.google.com/site/theendtimewarning/jesus-born-of-god-not-created

"He is a heretic who does NOT believe what the Roman Hierarchy teaches. A heretic merits the pains of fire. By the Gospel, the canons, civil law, and custom." –{Directorium Inquisitorum, published in Rome, October 1584, by the command of the Cardinals Inquisitors General; dedicated to Pope Gregory XIII; translation by J.P. Callender, Illustrations of Popery, New York, 1838. Pages 148, 169}

One strange twist on this "Eucharistic god" is this. The Roman doctrine of Transubstantiation confirms that the Pope himself, John Paul II, is actually a desecrator of what they refer to as "the most Holy Eucharist."  He actually desecrates their "god" by omission. His complete and utter failure to remove cardinals and bishops that have been openly known to protect the child rapists running rampant all over the world. Truth is, John Paul II or ANY pope could never assume ignorance here. For a man in his position would absolutely know about every good or evil deed performed by his understudies. This pope as well as all popes are actually accomplices in all offenses against God, and that fact alone makes them just as guilty as those who committed these acts under his admitted jurisdiction. The pope has full power to remove any and all of these offending cardinals, bishops, and priests from office, yet he fails to do so. Not only that he hides them in Rome and refuses to allow other countries to bring them to justice, INCLUDING the USA. Sharing in his guilt are the numerous prelates (high ranking clerics), heads of government at all levels in Rome, police and other public officials, cooperating voters, and church members.

Now that we have a basic and fair definition of this doctrine along with an understanding of just how highly Rome thinks about it. Be prepared to see how Rome uses this doctrine to declare Jesus Christ a WEAK and useless Creator God. Just as prophecy said they would. Fact is, as you have just witnessed, they already claim themselves capable of "creating the Creator." So the following Roman Catholic authenticated dogmatic statements regarding this doctrine should be of no surprise to anyone who believes the prophecy of Daniel chapter 7:25.

     “Jesus awaits us in this sacrament of love. Let us not refuse the time to go to meet him in adoration, in contemplation full of faith, and open to making amends for the serious offenses and crimes of the world. Let our adoration never cease.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, Section Two, Chapter One, Article 3, Subsection V, #1365, 1369, 1374, 1377, 1380.http://www.christusrex.org/www1/CDHN/euch2.html#presence).

     “...the Eucharist cannot unite us to Christ without at the same time cleansing us from past sins and preserving us from future sins...If, as often as his blood is poured out, it is poured for the forgiveness of sins, I should always receive it, so that it may always forgive my sins. Because I always sin, I should always have a remedy.[St. Ambrose, De Sacr. 4, 6, 28: PL 16, 446; cf. 1 Cor 11:26.]" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, Section Two, Chapter One, Article 3, Subsection VI, #1393.http://www.christusrex.org/www1/CDHN/euch2.html#BANQUET).

Once again, God’s Word and Catholic tradition couldn’t be farther apart. Regarding cleansing from past sins, the Bible declares that all sins are washed away through the blood of Jesus Christ:

                “…the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.” 1 John 1:7

“And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness…Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,” Revelation 1:5

The Catechism strips away from Christ the credit He alone deserves for cleansing people from their sins, and credits instead a wafer with accomplishing that task. Why is Jesus demoted again?

                “And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” 1 Corinthians 6:11

Who came up with the 501(c)(3)?


Lyndon B. Johnson

Lyndon B. Johnson
Most churches in America have organized as "501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations." This is a fairly recent trend that has only been going on for about fifty years. Churches were only added to section 501c3 of the tax code in 1954. House Resolution 235 was designed to revise the IRS code to remove restrictions placed on churches and non-profit organizations in 1954 by then-Senator Lyndon Johnson. Prior to 1954, churches and non-profit organizations had no such restrictions on their freedom of speech or their right to speak out in favor or against political issues or candidates. The history of Johnson’s IRS gag order is instructive. It began with what some historians believe to be a fraudulent election of Johnson to the Senate in 1948. It has been maintained by both conservative and liberal historians that Lyndon Johnson’s election to the Senate in 1948 was won by massive voter fraud. Known as “Landslide Lyndon,” this aspiring politician was “elected” by only 87 votes. His challenger, Coke Stevenson, challenged his election and presented credible evidence that hundreds of votes for Johnson had been faked. Johnson, however, was successful in blocking Stevenson’s effort by the clever use of “cooperative” court injunctions.
    In 1954, Johnson was facing re-election to the Senate and was being aggressively opposed by two non-profit anti-Communist groups that were attacking Johnson’s liberal agenda. In retaliation, Johnson inserted language into the IRS code that prohibited non-profits, including churches, from  endorsing or opposing candidates for political office. In effect, Senator Johnson used the power of the go-along Congress and the IRS to silence his opposition. Unfortunately, it worked. Some in Johnson’s staff claimed that Johnson never intended to go after churches, only the two “nonprofits” in Texas. Nevertheless, his sly amendment to the tax code affected every church in  America, and it is a violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The legislation proposed by Rep. Jones in the 109th Congress is designed to overturn Johnson’s vindictive gag order that now  penalizes churches, churches that dare speak out against government policies and politicians that the churches may deem to be immoral or bad for America. There  is no reason for this gag order to remain in effect, but Congress apparently  thinks it must perpetuate bad public policy simply because it exists. Organizations like Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, People For The American Way, and The American Civil Liberties Union continue to claim that this Johnson gag order must be upheld to protect “church/state separation.” This is irrational and fails to take into account the entire history of religious freedom in the United States. 
    Throughout our nation’s history-both before and after the American Revolution-our nation’s pastors freely spoke out on the political and moral issues of the day. It was their duty and their right under the Constitution to preach against immorality and corruption in the political and the moral realm. Historian James H. Hutson, writing in Religion and the Founding of the American Republic, notes: “Preachers seemed to vie with their brethren in other colonies in arousing their congregations against George III.” And, as Hutson discovered, the House of Representatives sponsored church services in its chambers for nearly 100 years. These services only ended when convenient transportation was available to take Members of Congress home for the weekend. It is interesting to observe that our Founding Fathers and our first elected officials didn’t have any notion of “church/state separation,” so vehemently endorsed by Americans United and other modernist groups. Our Founders  valued religion and wrote the First Amendment to protect the free expression of  religious beliefs-and the freedom to speak out on the moral issues-including  those involving politics and politicians. The disservice that Lyndon Johnson did to religious freedom has yet to be undone, but in the current session of Congress, H.R. 235 must be passed-to undo Johnson’s vengeful action against his political opponents. We need to finally exorcise our public policies of the sad legacy of Landslide Lyndon. 


What are the results when a church incorporates and surrenders itself to the jurisdiction of the state?


1)  The Church is no longer considered a real institution, but it goes through a transformation and becomes a fictitious (state created)  person or institution.
2)  The Church comes under  the jurisdiction of the state and therefore surrenders its headship to the state.
3)  The Church’s chief officers become  official representatives of the state by virtue of their corporate charter.
4)  The Church must open its books and all practices to the investigation of the state. This would include:
       a. Church membership roles;
       b. Christian school record;
       c. Regulations on all functions of the church and any of its ministries;
       d. Church financial records, including  all tithing records (names, addresses and amounts);
       e. Ministers and churches in courts of law are considered wards of  the state
by virtue of their charter, including all church members 
          (adults and children). The Transformation of the Church (From Reality to Fiction) by  Kenneth

http://www.israelitesunite.com/501c3-exposed.html
https://sites.google.com/site/theendtimewarning/501c3

Preserving From Future Sins

There is no scriptural evidence that eating a piece of bread will preserve anyone from future sins. This doctrine’s only practical function is to keep members returning to the Catholic Church to receive the Eucharist, in hopes that it will help preserve them from sin.

Aside from holding people in bondage to the church, there is little else such a practice can accomplish.

Through God’s Word does not endorse this practice, it does suggest a way you can protect yourself from sin:

                “Thy Word have I hid in my heart, that I might not sin against thee.” Psalm 119:11

“Wherewithal shall a young man cleanse his way? by taking heed thereto according to they word.” Psalm 119:9

To preserve yourself from sin, God suggests that you read, memorize and obey the Bible. Curiously, the Catholic church disagrees. It seems that the Catholic leadership would rather have you looking to the church for help than to God’s Word.

You must decide why:

                “The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil…” Psalm 121:7

“Thou are my hiding place; thou shalt preserve me from trouble; thou shalt compass me about with songs of deliverance. Selah.” Psalm 32:7

“And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.” 2 Timothy 4:18

Conclusion

To cleanse you from past sins and protect you from future sins, Catholicism demands that you look to a piece of bread.

It is imperative that you understand that this tradition of men directly contradicts God’s Word. To obey Catholic doctrine, you must reject Holy Scriptures.

Do you really want to do this?

"Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, to the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen." Jude 1:24-25

Eucharist: Helps the Dead

Partaking of the Eucharist purportedly gives Catholics (and those denominations that have a 501c3 status in the US) who are still alive an opportunity to help the dead:

“The Eucharistic sacrifice is also offered for the faithful departed who "have died in Christ but are not yet wholly purified," so that they may be able to enter into the light and peace of Christ:” Pg. 345, #1371

“In the Eucharist, the Church expresses her efficacious communion with the departed…” Pg. 420 #1689

This heart-tugging doctrine indoctrinates Roman Catholics with the belief that regularly receiving the Eucharist will help their departed loved ones reach heaven faster.

If this doctrine is of God, then you should obey it. But if it’s a tradition of men to keep people in bondage to a church, then it is a cruel and heartless method of controlling people. Let’s see what God says about it.

 

Never Mentioned

You can search the Scriptures from beginning to end, but you will not find the Eucharist helping a single dead person. And not one Bible character ever received the Eucharist on behalf of a departed loved one.

As you may suspect, this Catholic tradition is not only absent from God’s Word, it directly violates it as well. The Bible teaches that we will each give account for our own life:

                “So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.” Romans 14:12

Jesus did all the work

People enter heaven solely because of the good work Jesus Christ did on the cross. Salvation is a gift from God, not an item earned by our righteousness or righteousness of friends and loved ones.

 

Death, then judgment

The Bible declares that after death, everyone faces God for judgment. There are no more chances.
            “And it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:” Hebrews 9:27
Those who do not put their faith in Christ while they are alive are already condemned to die:

“He that believeth on him (Jesus) is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” John 3:18

The wrath of God abides on those who die without Christ:

“He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.” John 3:36

The Bible says nothing about God’s wrath being pacified because someone received the Eucharist on behalf of departed loved ones. The only way to avoid condemnation of God is by placing your faith in Jesus Christ while you are alive. 
Jesus declared: “…He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.” John 5:24

 

Conclusion

Once again, you are left with several questions which must be answered:

  • Why is this tradition of the Catholic Church so diametrically opposed to God’s Holy Word?
  • Why does modern Adventism use the word Eucharist when it is blasphemous? 
  • Why does the Catholic Church want members performing rituals for the dead, when God’s Word says such practices are useless?
  • Is this but another method of keeping people in bondage to the Catholic Church?

Most importantly, you need to understand that to continue practicing this man-made tradition, you must reject the very words of Jesus Christ. Are you sure you want to do this?

                "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." Colossians 2:8


Eucharist: You are what you eat

The Eucharist teaches that the bread becomes the actual body of Christ instead of the truth which is that the bread is only to be a "symbol" of Christ, NOT the actual physical body of Christ! Not turned into the actual physical body of Christ through prayer over the bread/wafer.


 In the early 1100’s AD, a great hero of the persecuted Church of the Wilderness, Henry of Lausanne, rose up in southern France preaching the true Word of God—that baptism avails nothing without faith; that Christ is only spiritually present in the sacrament; that prayers and alms profit not dead men; that purgatory is a mere invention; and the church is not made up of cemented stones, but of believing men.  Thousands flocked to hear his sermons.  Rome’s churches were emptying; the priests were without flocks; and pilgrimages, fasts, invocation of saints, and oblations for the dead were all neglected. 








THE WATCHMAN'S CRY 

The Eucharist is prayed over to the Trinity of Gods and believed to be the ACTUAL BODY of Christ - whereas COMMUNION is to be a SYMBOL of the body of Christ (Tammuz really or Satan really) - this do in remembrance of Him...




  1. [PDF] 



Excerpt taken from "The Second Window" © Copyright 1997 by Nicholas

"How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?  Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."-Matthew 16:11-12


In the year 1215 A.D. the Pope Innocent III decreed the doctrine of transubstantiation. This is the doctrine that states the priest has the ability to perform the miracle of changing the wafer into the body of Jesus Christ for all Catholics to receive as communion. Five years later in 1220 A.D. Pope Honorius sanctioned the adoration of the wafer as doctrine.


  • Luke 22:19,20 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.  20  Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you

These are two verses that have indeed been taken out of context. As a devoted Catholic (Nicholas), I actually believed that the priest had that ability to change the wafer into the body of Jesus every single time I went to mass. Many people from all other churches have time and time again tried to explain to me that Jesus was speaking in a symbolic way when He said the bread was His flesh, and the wine was His blood. But I would have no part of their explanation. Even though I read John 6:35  about how "Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst..." I realized Jesus was saying He was the meaning of life. But I quickly blew that off because I didn't want to believe that my church was wrong. It would mean that Jesus wasn't really asking us to eat Him as a cannibal eats his prey. However, reading John 1:14  makes one realize that, "...the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,..." So when Jesus said we must eat His flesh, He actually meant,We must eat His Word. But I was still confused. It wasn't until I read Jeremiah 15:16 that I understood,  "Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart..." It was also confirmed to my heart when I read these verses...

  • Revelation 10:8-9, "And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.  And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey."
  • Ezekiel 2:8-9, "But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee; Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house: open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee. And when I looked, behold, an hand was sent unto me; and, lo, a roll of a book was therein;"
  • Ezekiel 3:1-3, "Moreover he said unto me, Son of man, eat that thou findest; eat this roll, and go speak unto the house of Israel. So I opened my mouth, and he caused me to eat that roll. And he said unto me, Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee. Then did I eat it; and it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness."
  • Psalms 119:103, "How sweet are thy words unto my taste! yea, sweeter than honey to my mouth!"
  • Hebrews 6:5, "And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,"
  • Psalms 34:8, "O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him."
  • Jeremiah 15:16, "Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts."

Could it be the Catholic church is having a hard time understanding what Jesus meant when He said He is the bread of life? This is not uncommon, even back then "The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?" [John 6:52] And sadly yes, even "Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?" [John 6:60] And because they couldn't understand what Jesus meant we read that, "From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him." [John 6:66] And still to this day people the world over still worship the wafer as Jesus incarnate. The Almighty is not one that has to be placed in a wafer to be worshipped. The Bible tells us very plainly that "God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." [John 4:24] In fact in verse 58 of John 6 we see Jesus even explaining to them that this "eating of bread"  is not "as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live forever." For Jesus to bluntly explain that the type of bread eating He is speaking of is in no way .like "eating manna," is a blunt fact that sadly only a natural man void of Heavenly Truth can miss. To go one step further in the discussion of this doctrine of transubstantiation, or "turning the wafer into Jesus Christ incarnate." I would like to bring to your attention the following decree that the Catholic church still considers binding doctrine today.


 "If anyone denies that in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist (communion wafer) are contained truly, really and substantially the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ, but says that He is in it only as a sign, or figure or force, let him be anathema." (An exhausted definition of "Anathema" = To be damned and put to death) Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent. Original text with English translation, by Rev. H.J. Schroeder, O.P., B. Herder Book Co. 1960, p.79, Canon 1.


 Put to death? Does this appear to be Christlike behavior? I was shocked when I read this. Doesn't Jesus tell us in Luke 6:27 that everyone should "Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you," God Almighty does not want worship out of fear. If He did He would have killed Satan and his fallen angels the first day of their Heavenly revolt. However, this would indeed have caused many of the angels to fear God, wouldn't it? The Almighty wants us to make a choice to worship Him out of our own free will. If we are forced into worship, is it true worship? Have you ever been forced into doing something you didn't want to do? Did you feel happiness? Did you feel joy? Did you want to continue doing it forever? Did you want your friends or loved ones to join you? Was it something you looked forward to? We are either a Christian, or we are not a Christian. There are NO gray areas in Christianity. Still, there are those laws of the Catholic church that makes forced worship a doctrine accepted by God.


 "If anyone says that in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist (communion wafer), Christ, the only begotten Son of God, is not to be adored with the worship of latria, also outwardly manifested, and is consequently neither to be venerated with a special festive solemnity, nor to be solemnly borne about in procession according to the laudable and universal rite and custom of the holy Church, or it not to be set publicly before the people to be adored and the adorers thereof are idolaters, let him be anathema." Ibid., p.80, Canon 6


The priest says mass, and he presumably turns the wafer into Jesus, or he publicly carries the wafer in a religious parade. If anyone steps forward to say the wafer is merely a symbol of Jesus, and really isn't the body, blood and soul of Jesus Christ, or they refuse to bow to it, or call it idol worship. They MUST be killed. Is this Christlike? Would Jesus approve? Some will say, "This is ancient history, it doesn't apply today" Even if they're right ancient or current history, is this right for a church to do? Besides, it is no longer ancient history. The FACT is the Vatican II council kept this particular doctrine on the books as present day legal binding Catholic doctrine.

 Adoration of the communion wafer is one thing, plain and simple. It is the worship of a god that is made by human hands. Unless the wafer is miraculously created without the aid of a human to form or cook it in an oven, it is made by human hands. Period. And according to the Word of God, the Almighty does NOT reside in anything made by human hands...

  • Acts 7:48 Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,
  • Acts 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
  • Acts 19:26 Moreover ye see and hear, that not alone at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia, this Paul hath persuaded and turned away much people, saying that they be no gods, which are made with hands:
  • 2 Corinthians 5:1 For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.
  • Hebrews 9:11 But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building;
  • Hebrews 9:24 For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:
  • Jeremiah 44:19 And when we burned incense to the queen of heaven, and poured out drink offerings unto her, did we make her cakes to worship her, and pour out drink offerings unto her, without our men?

Worship belongs to the Creator, not His creation. Paul tells us in Romans 1:25  that there will be those "Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen." Is not the wafer a creation? Even if it is broken down into its base elements, the molecules within the wafer were created by an Almighty and Ever Living Creator God.

By the way, if Jesus really did literally turn the wine into His blood, then explain this...

  • Matthew 26:28-29, "For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.  But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom."

In verse 28 Jesus declares the wine His blood, and the very next verse has Jesus declaring it the fruit of the vine. Biblical proof, Jesus was speaking symbolically.


To give you an idea of just how far this "turning the wafer into God" has gone. See here the actual wordds of the Catholic church in regards to this act...

"...we find in obediance to the words of his priests - Hoc est Corpus Meum - God Himself descends on the altar, that he comes whenever they call Him; and as often as they call Him, and places Himself in their hands, even though they should be His enemies. And after having come, he remains, entirely at their disposal; they move Him as they please, from one place to another; they may, if they wish, shut Him up in the tabernacle, expose Him on the altar, or carry Him outside the church; they may, if they choose, eat His flesh, and give Him for the food of others. ;Oh how great is their power!' -The Dignity of the priesthood by Liguori p. 26,27

"...the power of the priest is the power of the divine person; for the transubstantiation of the bread requires as much power as the creation of the world. ...thus the priest may be called the creator of the Creator..." -The diginity of the priesthood, p. 33


The most blunt passage that I have found to date that declares Jesus Christ was NOT speaking "literally" in regards to His "flesh" can be found in John chapter 6.


One  more thing to mention. At the last supper "UNLEAVENED" bread was used for a symbol of Christ's sinless flesh. Had there been leaven in it, it would have represented CORRUPTION in the bread. And as we all know, Christ Jesus NEVER sinned. Therefore, His flesh would not be stained with the corruption of sin.

  • Matthew 26:17, "Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?"

We also have this confirmed in the Old Testament when they would bring a lamb as a sin offering. It had to be WITHOUT blemish. If it would have had any blemishes it would have represented an imperfect offering. Seeing how they were using lamb's to signify the perfect "Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world" (John 1:29) An imperfect offering would have meant that in the future Christ would have been imperfect. So, sheep with blemishes were rejected by the priest.

  • 1 Peter 1:19, "But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:"

The reason I am sharing this with you is to illustrate how important the symbolism is in the communion of our Lord. Looking at the Roman Catholic Eucharist with it's SYMBOLS OF BAAL etched on it portrays a corrupted offering. PLUS, look to the wine they use in the Roman Catholic church as well. It is FERMENTED wine. That means the wine has been allowed to rot so as to ferment and become alcoholic in nature. This wine is the fruit of a corrupted, or "rotten" fruit. Therefore, even the wine they offer in communion in the Roman Catholic church portrays a corrupted offering. BOTH the bread and the wine of the Roman church has evidence of death and corruption within it. Therefore in simplicity, it is an ANTI-Communion of sorts!


To summarize in a few words... 
If the Religious leaders claim Jesus IS in the wafer. Then they are IDOL worshippers.

For more info on idol worship being taught in the Roman Catholic church, click here.


  • Turns out, even modern day Catholics fear the "communion wine" hasn't really changed into the blood of Christ. They are deciding now to forgoe the communion wine due to swine flu fears? See this article... Flu frightens Catholics to forgoe communion?

Freedom of curosity and freedom of knowledge. If modern SDA teaches people to see this kind of thing (the truth about the Eucharist) there would not be any members left in the SDA church. This remark, is of course, far from stupid, and it's implications are far reaching. It's obvious that tight censorship or exposure of Laodcians/SDA members from Historical SDA pioneer beliefs is a necessity in any modern war against losing its members.

The need to keep people in the dark about SDA plans is huge. People are asleep! Laodicean! Foolish virgins. It is  valuable to conceal the truth to those a church wants to mislead. To supplant error for truth. It's the devil's way from the beginning. But it's also necessary to keep the TRUTH BEFORE THE PEOPLE! If you are trained that no matter what the SDA church does it is going thru to the end...just like the Jews believed they were God's Chosen people until the end.... IF in the absence of censorship people might learn to be critical or to know the truth. 

My point is this: If you are trained to be uncrital of the SDA church, you can easily go just a little bit further, and learn to be uncrital of government, and of authority and of all established and received institutions. The result is of course the DEATH OF THE MIND. The transformation of the higher learning in independent scholarship into a cheering section for whatever popular notions and supersitions prevail at the moment.

IS YOUR CARNAL MIND DEAD TO THE TRUTH?

Have You Received A MIND Transplant From Christ? 

With a new hope the sin sick man looks upon Jesus. The expression of His Countenance, the tones of His voice, are like no other. Love and power seem to breathe from His very Presence. The sin-cripple's faith takes hold upon Christ's Word. Without question he sets his will to obey, and, as he does this, his whole body responds!

Salvation is simple. It is so simple that none be lost except those who refuse to “be saved in God’s own appointed way.”  Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 2, p. 445.

Yet salvation is also splendid. It is a mind transplant. And this means exactly what it says. It is not a mind bypass but a mind transplant. The carnal mind must be excised. Ezekiel 36:26.

Our carnal minds are so corrupt, defiled, and desperately wicked that they must be surgically removed by the sword of God’s Spirit.

In order for us to be saved we must unconditionally accept TWO priceless gifts:

1)      We must accept the free gift of Christ’s sacrificed life to pay the price for our sins. Yet Christ’s dying and death on the cross is not enough to save us from sin. We must accept yet another priceless gift of love.

2)      We must accept Christ’s very own mind that we may live His life of victory over sin.

The apostle Paul clearly understood both of these equally important aspects of salvations. He writes:

1)      “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.” Galations 2:20.

2)      Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:” Philippians 2:5. The original language clearly shows that this is to be the very same mind as Christ’s mind, his very own attitudes, his very own thoughts.

This is indeed the mystery or secret of Godly living. Unless Christ’s holy mind can control our unholy flesh we cannot have His love, joy, peace, happiness, victory or salvation.

SDA Church uses Catholic term "Eucharist" to describe communion bread
  • "The purpose of this essay is primarily to show how Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the eucharist or the Lord's supper...[and] to highlight Adventist understanding and practice of the eucharist...  "In preparation for the celebration of the eucharist Seventh-day Adventists practice the washing of feet..." Churches Respond to Baptism,Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 341-343, 1985. (This is the SDA churchs' official response to the ecumenical meeting they were a part of at the Faith and Order Conference of the World Council of Churches of January, 1982 in Lima, Peru).
  •  --The Eucharist is also called the "central celebration of the Christian church" (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 341). (Notice they captilize the "Eucharist" in the same way Rome does to depict a "living presence" within the bread.)
  •  --The church also states; "On occasion Seventh-day Adventists refer to the eucharist as a sacrament" (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342).
  • --The church also state that SDA's are "conscious of the sacredness of the celebration of the eucharist" (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342). (Here they use the Catholic term "celebration" when speakign of the eucharist. The term "celebration" was also used by Rome when they would kill Christians.)
  • "And we could go on if space permitted--to mention the WCC's... accentuation of the Holy Spirit and the Eucharist. All of these emphases fit into the ambit of the three angels' messages." Adventist Review, May 2, 1991, p 10.
"Dr. Samuel Bacchiocchi, the first non-Catholic to graduate from the Pontifical Gregorian Univ. in Rome, Italy, will hold a Lord's Day Seminar...the Pontifical Gregorian Univ., a prestigious Jesuit University. Bacchiocchi...was awarded a gold medal donated by Pope Paul VI..."Recorder, Mar 17, 1986, p 17-18.

NOTE: Does the pope bless heretics? Bacchiocchi (deceased) was a SDA teacher at Andrews Univ.

In Lima, Peru over 100 theologians met in Jan. 1982 to discuss unity of doctrine regarding Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry. They all "recommended unanimously" an agreed statement on these three doctrines for the "official response of the churches." Represented were "virtually all the major church traditions; Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Old Catholic, Lutheran, Anglican, Reformed, Methodist, United, Disciples, Baptist, Adventist and Pentecostal." WCC Faith and Order Paper, #111, 1982 (Back page).

"SDA's Staff Booth at Eucharistic Congress." Adventist Review, Feb 6, 1986, p 29.

------------------------- more here
To: Margaret Murray Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: The events in France. 15th February 2012
Thank you for your email.  Yes, I can confirm that the move for changing our God’s given name of Seventh Day Adventist is about to change for Catholic Apostolic Church, following a conversation that I had last Sunday with one of an influential and genuine Seventh day Adventist brothers from France. Apparently there will be other changes: the Lord’s Supper for instance, will be called, the Eucharist,  while the Sabbath school will be called: the Catechism.   As you can see all these new names are from Catholic derivation. It is believed also from  Adventist official sources, that  a meeting will be held shortly on this issue with Pentecostal, Evangelical, and Adventist representatives in America in a top secret location, as the Adventist leaders do not want the church members to know anything about such a move until things are done and settled. This is what I was told.  While the devil is seeking actively to destroy our churches, let us never forget that our Lord is in control of every situation and the devil will not prevail. God bless. 
-----------------------
--The Beast, being Roman Catholicism (Revelation 13:1-8, Daniel 7:8-14, 20-21, 24-27, 8:9-14, 23-25, GC 438-50, 7BC 972), with the foundation of this church being the Trinity of gods... The Eucharist--a most "blasphemous" and "heaven-insulting heresy" (4SOP 63).  Also the Pope and the Catholic system as Anti-christ (GC 142-43, TM 37), and our duty is to expose him and the papacy (Ev 233, 1SM 196). 

What about the Eucharist being blasphemous and heaven-insulting?
     "The purpose of this essay is primarily to show how Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the eucharist or the Lord's supper...[and] to highlight Adventist understanding and practice of the eucharist...
     "In preparation for the celebration of the eucharist Seventh-day Adventists practice the washing of feet..." Churches Respond to BEM(Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry), vol 2 (2BEM), p 341-343, 1985. (This is the SDA churchs' official response to the ecumenical meeting they were a part of at the Faith and Order Conference of the World Council of Churches (WCC) of January, 1982 in Lima, Peru).

     The Eucharist is also called by the SDA church as being the "central celebration of the Christian church" (2BEM 341).  The church also states; "On occasion Seventh-day Adventists refer to the eucharist as a sacrament" (2BEM 342).  They also state that SDA's are "conscious of the sacredness of the celebration of the eucharist" (2BEM 342).
     Then appears this amazing declaration:
     "And we could go on if space permitted--to mention the WCC's... accentuation of the Holy Spirit and the Eucharist.  All of these emphasesfit into the ambit of the three angels' messages." AR May 2, 1991, p 10.

     What about the warning against the Beast or Catholicism?
     "Although it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint...that attitude on the church's part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative protestant denominations in the early part of this century and the latter part of the last, and which has now been consigned to the historical trash heap so far as the Seventh-day Adventist church is concerned." EEOC vs PPPA Civ #74-2025 CBR, Reply Brief for Defendants, p 4.

     "...our work is not to denounce the Roman Catholic Church." PUR February 18, 1985, p 4.

     What about the Pope as being Anti-christ?
     "...if he was taught that the Pope is the anti-christ, I think that would be a misunderstanding.  I don't feel that's what we as a church believe....
     "...[the anti-christ], that's not a person.  That's not an individual..." Kenneth Cox, WTGL TV interview, February 8, 1993.

     What about the Catholic system as Anti-christ?
     The anti-christ is not referred to as "the papacy," because the Catholic church has "defended belief in Christ's fleshly nature" (AR October 27, 1983, p 7).  But the Anti-christ is referred to as being:
-- "former christians" (SOT September, 1990, p 25).
-- "a mind-set" (SOT September, 1990, p 26).
-- those who teach "false doctrine qualify" (AR October 27, 1983, p 7).
-- those who "draw us away from our commitment to Christ" (SOT September, 1990, p 26).
-- those who "deny that Jesus is the Christ or the Messiah" (SOT September, 1990, p 25). [Hence the Devil and all his angels cannot be anti-christ either (Matt 8:29, Mark 1;24, Luke 4:34)!]
     What about the Lamb-like Beast being the United States?
     The Lamb-like Beast is not referred to as being the USA, but is vaguely referred to as being "an idol-making power" (AR October 15, 1992, p 10).  Or referred to as "the antispirit" (AR September 7, 1989, p 22-23).



A Heaven Insulting Heresy


The Baltimore Catechism

Roman Catholic Mass is unbiblical. A false doctrine propagated by a false Church, and many evangelical pastors and preachers have been joining hands with the Roman Catholic system and encouraging others to do the same.  The Bible declared;

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; (I Tim. 4:1)

The Roman Catholic teaching about mass is certainly a devil’s teaching. If we try to review some publications written by Catholic theologians like the Baltimore Catechism, a book with an imprimatur which means that the doctrine within that Catechism was approved by the Roman Catholic Church itself, we will see a very blasphemous teaching. The Catechism says;

Notice the two words mentioned in the book – “unbloody manner“. This is a clear blasphemy. The cross of Jesus Christ is a completely finished work. In John 19:20, Christ said, “IT IS FINISHED“.  So the meaning of the mass, as described by Catechism, is totally against the work of Christ. The Catechism says;

That’s more heresy. Yes it is. Jesus Christ Himself said, IT IS FINISHED. The Mass is teaching the Roman Catholic people that the sacrifice of Christ is repeated!  Romans 5:6-10 contradicts this teaching by saying ,

For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.

For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.

But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.

For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

-

One of the purposes of the Mass, according to Catechism, is to satisfy the justice of God for the sins committed against Him. Clearly, this is a great blasphemy. Of course, the mass cannot satisfy anything because the justice of God satisfy only through Christ!

I want to call your attention about the mass cards. Many people are unaware about these cards. A person can donate money for a card request for the mass dedicated for the deceased. In fact one of the suggested donation is $5 for one mass, or you could have nine masses for a suggested donation of $45. It means that mass can offer not only for the living, but also for the dead. Friends, this practice is in going on for centuries. But actually, this thing was indeed unbiblical and against the Bible.

a mass card

Ladies and Gentleman, these are the teachings that leading people astray. In Ephesians 2:8-9, the Bible clearly states,

For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God; not of works lest any man should boast.

Why do we speak out against the Roman Catholic doctrines such as the Roman Catholic mass? It is because these are false doctrines and false doctrines are leading great numbers of people into perdition. Even the Modern as of 1980 Seventh Day Adventist church as adopted this spurious doctrine. 

Before sharing something that will no doubt shock you, I would like to define the Roman Catholic doctrine of "transubstantiation," and the vital importance Rome places upon it. In the year 1215A.D. Pope Innocent III decreed the doctrine of transubstantiation. This is the Roman doctrine that states the priest has the ability to perform the miracle of changing the wafer into the body of Jesus Christ for all Catholics to receive as communion. Five years later in 1220A.D. Pope Honorius sanctioned the adoration and or worship of the wafer as doctrine.

In essence, the Roman Catholic church is declaring that it has the power to change normal bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus Christ, the Creator of all that is seen and unseen. They truly believe the host (Eucharist) is in fact the TRUE body and blood of Jesus Christ Himself, and is in fact worthy of worship and adoration. Since they think this, do you suppose this doctrine will cause them to believe they are above the Creator?

"...the power of the priest is the power of the divine person; for the transubstantiation of the bread requires as much power as the creation of the world. ...thus the priest may be called the creator of the Creator..." -The dignity of the priesthood by Liguori, p. 33

 "If anyone says that in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist (communion wafer), Christ, the only begotten Son of God, is not to be adored with the worship of latria, also outwardly manifested, and is consequently neither to be venerated with a special festive solemnity, nor to be solemnly borne about in procession according to the laudable and universal rite and custom of the holy Church, or it not to be set publicly before the people to be adored and the adorers thereof are idolaters, let him be anathema." Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent. Original text with English translation, by Rev. H.J. Schroeder, O.P., B. Herder Book Co. 1960, Canon 6

The Roman Catholic priests have literally been brainwashed into thinking they are not only above the Creator. They are taught they ARE the "creator of the Creator." They stand by this doctrine to such an extent that they have actually killed hundreds of millions of people that denied the Eucharist was Jesus Christ incarnate during the prophesied great tribulation they personally enacted upon the true church of Jesus Christ during what history "softly" refers to as the dark ages. In fact, to this day it is placed in writing by the Vatican itself that those who do deny this doctrine, or any doctrine of Rome, should be damned, persecuted, sent to the flames, or whatever, as is apparent in the following quotes.

 "If anyone denies that in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist (communion wafer) are contained truly, really and substantially the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ, but says that He is in it only as a sign, or figure or force, let him be anathema." (An exhausted definition of "Anathema" = To be damned and put to death) p.79, Canon 1.

By the consecration the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ is brought about. Under the consecrated species of bread and wine Christ himself, living and glorious, is present in a true, real, and substantial manner: his Body and his Blood, with his soul and his divinity (cf. Council of Trent: DS 1640; 1651). From the Catechism of the Catholic Church.1413

"Experience teaches that there is no other remedy for the evil, but to put heretics (Protestants) to death; for the (Romish) church proceeded gradually and tried every remedy: at first she merely excommunicated them; afterwards she added a fine; then she banished them; and finally she was constrained to put them to death." -Cardinal Bellarmine famous champion of Romanism cited by Schumucker p. 76 
 
 " 'The church,' says [Martin] Luther, 'has never burned a heretic.' . . I reply that this argument proves not the opinion, but the ignorance or impudence of Luther. Since almost infinite numbers were either burned or otherwise killed, Luther either did not know it, and was therefore ignorant, or if he was not ignorant, he is convicted of impudence and falsehood,--for that heretics were often burned by the [Catholic Church may be proved from many examples."--Robert Bellarmine, Disputationes de Controversiis, Tom. II, Lib. III, cap. XXII, 1628 edition [Bellarmine is one of the most respected Jesuit teachers in the history of the Gregorian University in Rome, the largest Jesuit training school in the world].

"The church may by Divine right confiscate the property of heretics, imprison their persons, and condemn them to the flames." -Vatican II

Who is a heretic you might ask? If you are not Catholic, then YOU are a heretic according to Rome.

"He is a heretic who does not believe what the Roman Hierarchy teaches. --A heretic merits the pains of fire. --By the Gospel, the canons, civil law, and custom."--148, 169

One strange twist on this "Eucharistic god" is this. The Roman doctrine of Transubstantiation confirms that the Pope himself, John Paul II, is actuallya desecrator of what they refer to as "the most Holy Eucharist."  He actually desecrates their "god" by omission. His complete and utter failure to remove cardinals and bishops that have been openly known to protect the child rapists running rampant all over the world. Truth is, John Paul II or ANY pope could never assume ignorance here. For a man in his position would absolutely know about every good or evil deed performed by his understudies. This pope as well as all popes are actually accomplices in all offenses against God, and that fact alone makes them just as guilty as those who committed these acts under his admitted jurisdiction. The pope has full power to remove any and all of these offending cardinals, bishops, and priests from office, yet  he fails to do so. Not only that he hides them in Rome and refuses to allow other countries to bring them to justice, INCLUDING the USA. Sharing in his guilt are the numerous prelates (high ranking clerics), heads of government at all levels in Rome, police and other public officials, cooperating voters, and church members.

Now that we have a basic and fair definition of this doctrine along with an understanding of just how highly Rome thinks about it. Be prepared to see how Rome uses this doctrine to declare Jesus Christ a WEAK and useless Creator God. Just as prophecy said they would. Fact is, as you have just witnessed, they already claim themselves capable of "creating the Creator." So the following Roman Catholic authenticated dogmatic statements regarding this doctrine should be of no surprise to anyone who believes the prophecy of Daniel chapter 7:25.

Power of Consecrating: 
The supreme power of the priestly office is the power of consecrating. 'No act is greater,' says St. Thomas, 'than the consecration of the body of Christ.' In this essential phase of the sacred ministry, the power of the priest is not surpassed by that of the bishop, the archbishop, the cardinal or the pope. Indeed it is equal to that of Jesus Christ. For in this role the priest speaks with the voice and the authority of God Himself. When the priest pronounces the tremendous works of Consecration, he reaches up into heavens, brings Christ down from His throne, and places Him upon our altar to be offered up again as the victim for the sins of man.

"It is a power greater than that of monarchs and emperors: it is greater than that of saints and angels, greater than that of Seraphim and Cherubim. Indeed it is greater even than the power of the Virgin Mary. For, while the Blessed Virgin was the human agency by which Christ became incarnate a single time, the priest brings Christ down from heaven, and renders Him present on our altar as the eternal Victim for the sins of man - not once but a thousand times! The priest speaks and lo! Christ the Eternal and Omnipotent God, bows His head in humble obedience to the priest’s command.

"Of what sublime dignity is the office of the Christian priest who is thus privileged to act as the ambassador and the vicegerent of Christ on earth! He continues the essential ministry of Christ; he teaches the faithful with the authority of Christ, he pardons the penitent sinner with the power of Christ, he offers up again the same sacrifice of adoration and atonement which Christ offered on Calvary. No wonder that the name which spiritual writers are especially found of applying to the priest is that of 'alter Christus.' For the priest is and should be another Christ(Faith of Millions, John O'Brien, Ph.D., LL.D., 268-269, "nihil obstat" by Rev. T. E. Dillon-Censor Librorum and "imprimatur" by John Francis Noll, D.D. -Bishop of Fort Wayne).

"The priest says: Hoc est corpus meum, he has to say it for the validity of the consecration. Meum! But it is not he who says these words; his voice indeed we hear, but he is only the instrument of the Sovereign Priest: our Lord speaks through His minister. The glory of this minister consists precisely in disappearing, in allowing Jesus to act through his personality: Sacerdos alter Christus. This Christ now offering Himself to God by the hands of the priest is the same Christ who is in heaven. Same happiness, same power, same majesty. He is performing the same acts, offering the same adorations, the same thanksgiving, the same prayers. He, the object of the beatitude of the elect, is now in the hands of the priest: Agnoscite quod agitis. But if really the priest causes our Lord to be present on the altar, if he offers Him, whilst Jesus is now in heaven, have we not to conclude that it is from the very bosom of the Father that the priest draws this divine Victim? Agnoscite quod agitis". (Our Priesthood, Rev.Joseph Bruneau, S.D.D., 149-151, "nihil obstat" by M.F. Dinneen, S.S.,D.D. -Censor deputatus, "imprimatur" by James Cardinal Gibbons -Archbishop of Baltimore, "Re-Imprimatur" by Michael J. Curley -Archbishop of Baltimore).

"...we find in the obediance to the words of his priests --- Hoc est Corpus Meum --- 
God Himself descends on the altar, that he comes whenever they call him, and as often as they call him, and places himself in their hands,even though they should be his enemies. And after having come, he remains, entirely at their disposalthey move him as they please, from one place to another; they may, if they wish, shut him up in the tabernacle, expose him on the altar, or carry him outside the church; they may, if they choose, eat his flesh, and give him for the food of others. 'Oh, how very great is their power!-The Dignity of the Priesthood by Ligouri p. 26,27


So... according to documented Roman Catholic sources, the Vatican is declaring that the priests of Rome have the power to REMOVE Christ from His Throne, regardless if He desires to come off that Throne. Because "Christ the Eternal and Omnipotent God, bows His head in humble obedience to the priest’s commandEVEN IF THEY ARE HIS ENEMIES?! They are declaring that even a decadent sinning priest has more power than Christ Himself! And what is the sin of choice for Rome? Sodomy! So a Sodomite priest is more powerful then Christ?

Now you know why they claim the child molesting priests of Rome are STILL considered priests. They can't go against their doctrines. Do some research and you will find that all the priests that are jailed for child molestation are STILL considered ordained priests of Roman Catholicism worthy of the title and still capable of removing Christ from His throne. The Roman Catholic church refuses to excommunicate those priests even if they are convicted and JAILED for such hideous crimes as child molestation!.

Now since we know that Jesus Christ is the Creator of all that is seen and unseen. For Scriptures do in fact confirm, "All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." - John 1:3 This means the Roman Catholic priest, 'A CREATED BEING' believes he has powers above that of His Creator. In fact, one would think that the priest is in fact a god, right? Historic fact is, Rome HAS said said this...

"Indeed, it is not too much to say that in view of the sublimity of their offices the priests are so many gods." (-The dignity of the priesthood by Liguori p, 36)

Seeing how they believe they are "gods." This would mean the Pope himself would even be above them, for he IS their leader. Fact is, the Pope has indeed declared that IN WRITING in numerous documents that very fact...

"The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man (...) he is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief of kings, having plenitude of power." -Lucius Ferraris, «Prompta Bibliotheca», 1763, Volume VI, 'Papa II', pp.25-29


"The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, he is Jesus Christ himself, hidden under the veil of flesh." Catholic National July 1895.


The title "Lord God the Pope" is found within a gloss of Extravagantes of Pope John XXII, title 14, chapter 4, 

In an Antwerp edition of the Extravagantes, the words, "Dominum Deum Nostrum Papam" (Our Lord God the Pope) can be found in column 153. In a Paris edition, they are found in column 140.

 "The pope is the supreme judge of the law of the land . . . He is the vicegerent of Christ, and is not only a priest forever, but also King of kings and Lord of lords"--La Civilta Cattolica, March 18, 1871. 

For a VERY long list of similar quotes, click here

With that in mind, listen to this...

Vatican Exorcism Fails
September 12, 2002 08:12 CDT

A British newspaper has reported an unusual encounter with the devil in the Vatican, with Pope John Paul II, himself, attempting an exorcism of a possessed young woman.

The Telegraph reported "the Pope carried out an impromptu exorcism on a teenage girl after she began screaming insults in a cavernous voice during an audience in the Vatican City. Despite the Pope's efforts and those of his chief 'Satan-buster,' Fr. Gabriele Amorth, the girl remained possessed. The Devil's voice sneeringly laughed from within her at the Pope's failed attempt to drive him away," said the British news organization. -Staff Writer Sally Suddock


Devil Defeats The Pope In Vatican Exorcism Battle 
by Bruce Johnston in Rome, The Electronic Telegraph, 9/11/02


THE Pope carried out an impromptu exorcism on a teenage girl after she began "screaming insults in a cavernous voice" during an audience in the Vatican City, it emerged at the weekend.

Despite the Pope's efforts and those of his chief "Satan-buster", Fr Gabriele Amorth, the girl remained "possessed". The Devil's voice "sneeringly laughed from within her" at the Pope's failed attempt to drive him away.

"The Devil went to the Vatican," the Il Messaggero newspaper in Rome reported after being told of the incident by Fr Amorth. He said the exorcism had been the Pope's third in his 22-year papacy.

The paper said that although there may have been other instances of people being possessed in the Vatican, last week's incident had been "spectacular" and Satan had "shown his muscles". The incident occurred during last Wednesday's general audience in a packed St Peter's Square. Suddenly the unnamed 19-year-old girl from Monza began shouting "in a cavernous voice and as if in a fit of rage".

Constrained by Vatican guards, she was said to have displayed "a super-human strengthas she violently pushed them away. Bishop Gianni Danzi, Secretary-General of Vatican City, intervened and sought to calm her by showed her a crucifix. But she began "insulting him, uttering disconnected phrases, and speaking in unknown tongues".

Bishop Danzi hurriedly informed the Pope's private secretary, Mgr Stanislao Dziwisz, who in turn told the pontiff. After driving around the piazza in his Popemobile, the Pope talked to the girl, exorcised her, and stayed with her for half an hour. He prayed for her and assured her that he would say a Mass for her the next day "to obtain her liberation".

But it appeared afterwards that the Pope's intervention had only a temporary effect on the girl. She was said to have been "possessed since she was 12", as a result of someone putting a curse on her out of hatred for her parents. She had been taken by her mother and father to the audience in the hope that a papal blessing would be of some benefit.

Fr Amorth claimed that the Vatican had attempted to cover up the affair. He said: "I exorcised the very same girl on [the day before the indident] together with another exorcist, Fr Giancarlo Gramolazzo.

"She is a splendid girl in terms of purity and goodness. Her case of possession by the Devil is terrible. It moves one to pity to see her suffer so, all bent over and contracted."

Kind of reminds you of a similar event recorded in Scripture doesn't it...

  • Acts 19:13-16, "Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth. And there were seven sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so. And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye? And the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, and overcame them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded."

 Like those that had no faith in Jesus, but plenty of faith in Paul the "man", the pope and his HEAD EXORCIST were unable to remove mere demons from this girl. Like the sons of Sceva, the Pope only has faith in mankind. YET, in the doctrine of TRANSUBSTANTIATION the lowly priest is said to have the power to remove Christ from His throne?

You do know what this means don't you? The Roman Catholic pope, and ALL his priests are now exposed IN WRITING as LIARS. And worse than this, they are making a mockery of Jesus Christ Himself. They are openly declaring now to all the world that MERE DEMONS ARE MORE POWERFUL THAN JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF! How? They say they CAN remove Christ from His throne, even if they are Sodomite child rapists, but they can NOT remove Satan from his! That's right! That's exactly what they allowed Satan to preach to the masses that very day in the Vatican itself when the Pope and his head exorcist could NOT cast a demon out of a young girl. EVERY Catholic believes the priests have the power to REMOVE Christ from His throne in the mass because they are taught over and over again at each an every mass they attend. And here they now have proof right before their eyes and the eyes of hundreds of witnesses INSIDE THE VATICAN as well as the billions via satellite that the priests can NOT remove Satan from his throne!

By the way... not too long afterwards, the Vatican actually told a bold face LIE to all those that have the ability to read. They did this to try and save face because of the failed exorcism. Notice this next article...

 W O R L D   N E W S   S T O R Y    
Pope notches up three exorcisms
19 February 2003

VATICAN CITY: Pope John Paul has performed three exorcisms during his 23-year pontificate, including one as recently as September, one of the Catholic Church's leading exorcists said on Monday. Father Gabriele Amorth told Italy's La Stampa newspaper that the Pope had carried out his first exorcism in 1982. "This girl was rolling around on the ground. People in the Vatican had never seen anything like it. For us exorcists it is run of the mill," Amorth said. The Pope has since taken part in two more exorcisms, including that of a 20-year-old woman in September, to underline the importance of the ceremony. "He carried out these exorcisms because he wanted to give a powerful example. He wanted to give the message that we must once again start exorcising those who are possessed by demons," Amorth said. For Roman Catholics, exorcism is the casting out of what is believed to be an evil spirit through prayer and the laying on of hands. Amorth said possession by demons took many shapes. "I have seen many strange things . . . objects such as nails spat out. The devil told a woman that he would make her spit out a transistor radio and lo and behold she started spitting out bits and pieces of a radio transistor," he said. "I have seen levitations, and a force that needed six or eight men to hold the person still. Such things are rare, but they happen," he said. Amorth said the woman whom the Pope exorcised in September was still undergoing treatment. "It's a very serious case. A series of curses," he said. The interview was published a day after the Pope warned of the daily temptations of the devil during his Sunday address. "The devil, the 'prince of this world', even today continues his insidious actions. Each and every man . . . is tempted by the devil when he least expects it," the Pope said. The official Roman Catholic exorcism starts with prayers, the blessing and sprinkling of holy water, the laying of hands on the possessed, and the making of the sign of the cross. It ends with the priest commanding the devil to leave the possessed person.

The Vatican is stating the exorcism worked in September? PLUS, the Vatican stated the girl is still undergoing treatment? Why does she need treatment? Was not the demon cast out as they just stated? And didn’t the article in September say they failed so miserably that the demon laughed at them? Ya know, when Jesus or His Apostles cast out demons they came out IMMEDIATELY and they did not need to have repeated "exorcisms" done to them, or “treatment” as Rome puts it. The power of Jesus Christ is not only MASSIVE, its UNIVERSAL and all demons, including Satan, know that. Fact is, the Pope and his "head exorcist" could NOT cast out the demons from that girl because,  "if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?" -Matthew 12:26

BTW... in the second article it is stated...  "The official Roman Catholic exorcism starts with prayers, the blessing and sprinkling of holy water, the laying of hands on the possessed, and the making of the sign of the cross. It ends with the priest commanding the devil to leave the possessed person."

Search the Scriptures... does it speak of holy water? NO! Does it speak of making the sign of the cross? NO! Laying on of hands without oil? NO! Ask any "knowledgeable" Catholic who knows about the inner workings of the church of Rome regarding exorcisms and they will tell you that exorcisms sometimes take months and even years to work, if at all. That in itself proves Rome has absolutely no power at all. In fact, MANY Catholics and even non-Catholics have sub-consciously been taught that Satan is far more powerful than Jesus because a mere Catholic priest can pull Him from His throne, but a mere demon directed by Satan is much more powerful than even the Pope himself can handle! Fact is people. If the pope or his priests had the power they say they have in transubstantiation, it would be a snap to cast demons out!

These "vagabonds" in Rome, as in Acts chapter 19, have no faith in Christ whatsoever, and that is why they have no power over Satan or his demons. They, like the sons of Sceva have faith in MAN. Period! And that is why they glorify MANKIND in Rome. Seriously! Walk into ANY Roman Catholic church and what do you see?

  • A DEAD Jesus on the cross
  • A DEAD Jesus in the arms of Mary
  • An INFANT Jesus in the arms of Mary
  • A CHILD Jesus on the back of St. Christopher.

Now... look around. What else do you see?

  • A LIVE Mary in statues
  • A LIVE St. Joseph in statues
  • A LIVE ST. Stanislaus... St. Blaze... St. Anthony... St Jerome... etc.

In the Roman Catholic church you see MANKIND depicted as being able to help you. But Jesus Christ is either DEAD or a helpless child being held or helped by mankind. Catholic's are taught, as were the sons of Sceva, to look upon Jesus Christ as unable to help you, however MANKIND can help you instead. In fact, notice that ALL the statues of mankind in the Roman Catholic churches have kneelers in front of them! The church of Rome boldly teaches that God the Father is also helpless! They shout boldly that ONLY MAN can hear your prayers! That's why the kneelers before the statues of MANKIND are so prevalent in Roman Catholic churches!

Case in point. What will this "faith in mankind" prevent the Catholic from experiencing?

2 Corinthians 11:23-31 states, "Are they ministers of Christ? (I speak as a fool) I am more; in labours more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more frequent, in deaths oft. Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep; In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren; In weariness and painfulness, in watchings often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness. Beside those things that are without, that which cometh upon me daily, the care of all the churches. Who is weak, and I am not weak? who is offended, and I burn not? If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern mine infirmities. The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not."

The apostle Paul is not seeking fame or glory for himself. No he seeks glory and honor to be bestowed upon God Almighty for blessing him with the strength to endure such attacks as this. His very much alive, breathing, and healthy body proclaims the Almighty to be a God that does indeed protect His own from death, and at the same time allow for Him to be glorified for all mankind to see. Yet the Pope who claims to be the entire World's Christian example openly proclaims otherwise. He drives about in a bullet proof "man-made" Pope-mobile proclaiming to all the world that God Almighty is unable to protect him as He did Paul. Therefore he must seek the help of mankind, the "created" beings of a living God to protect him instead. The Pope boldly tells all the loyal and trusting Catholic people that faith in God to protect you is a foolish act and you should rely on SELF orother men rather than God your Creator in desperate times of need. THAT is why they teach they can create a god for them to eat! That is the ultimate method of teaching the masses to worship the man.

Is not the Pope suppose to be the leader of the Catholic people? Is he not to be their example of Christian faith? Is he not suppose to show the weak in faith how a man of God trusts his Creator and by so doing glorify the Almighty at the same time? Shame on him for making such a vile and disgusting statement! Shame on him for making all Catholics appear to be as weak as he is! Shame on him for proclaiming the Almighty is a weak and useless God! I have met many Catholics over the years that have far greater faith than this man will ever have!

So I ask, when will the faithful Catholic stand up and proclaim that this church is no longer blessed of God? When will the true Christians still in this church open their eyes and see what their church leaders have done to their house of worship? When will the strong and God fearing Catholic shout from the rooftops that Hell has prevailed against the gates of this church! I know they are still in there! I have met them, and Revelation 18:1-4 states plainly that they are still in their. Fact is, the elect is in ALL the corrupted churches of the World. And as Revelation 18:1-4 states, they are about to LEAVE! THEY HAVE HAD ENOUGH!!

Pray for them my friends. Pray that they too will soon see that the church they call home has become "the habitation of devils and the hold of ever foul spirit." Pray that they will leave this "cage of every unclean bird" before the PLAGUES of Revelation fall upon them. For soon, very soon, all the world will see with their very owns eyes that the Scriptures were RIGHT! And Rome is WRONG!

  • Romans 3:4, "God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged."

By the way, some will come forward and say the priests that tried to cast the demon out of that young girl were no doubt lacking in some spiritual areas and are not the personification of the Catholic faith. Remind them that the Pope himself was TOTALLY unable to cast those demons out as well that day! Also remind them that the office of Pope is looked upon as the ultimate position a priest can hope to obtain. And since the "ultimate Catholic," who is the Pope, was unable to cast these demons out. That proves ALL the priests, including the Pope are as phony as the seven sons of Sceva in Acts 19:13-16.

To summarize in a few words... 
If the Religious leaders claim Jesus IS in the wafer. Then they are IDOL worshippers.


Despite condition, girl's first Communion deemed invalid
BRIELLE, N.J. (AP) — An 8-year-old girl who suffers from a rare digestive disorder and cannot eat wheat has had her first Holy Communion declared invalid because the wafer contained no wheat, violating Roman Catholic doctrine.

Now, Haley Waldman's mother is pushing the Diocese of Trenton and the Vatican to make an exception, saying the girl's condition should not exclude her from the sacrament, which commemorates the Last Supper of Jesus Christ before his crucifixion. The mother believes a rice Communion wafer would suffice.

"It's just not a viable option. How does it corrupt the tradition of the Last Supper? It's just rice versus wheat," said Elizabeth Pelly-Waldman. Church doctrine holds that Communion wafers, like the bread served at the Last Supper, must have at least some unleavened wheat. Church leaders are reluctant to change anything about the sacrament. "This is not an issue to be determined at the diocesan or parish level, but has already been decided for the Roman Catholic Church throughout the world by Vatican authority," Trenton Bishop John Smith said in a statement last week.

Haley was diagnosed with celiac sprue disease when she was 5. The disorder occurs in people with a genetic intolerance of gluten, a food protein contained in wheat and other grains. When consumed by celiac sufferers, gluten (pronounced GLOO'-ten) damages the lining of the small intestine, blocking nutrient absorption and leading to vitamin deficiencies, bone-thinning and sometimes gastrointestinal cancer. The diocese has told Haley's mother that the girl can receive a low-gluten wafer, or just drink wine at Communion, but that anything without gluten does not qualify. Pelly-Waldman rejected the offer, saying her child could be harmed by even a small amount of the substance.

Haley's Communion controversy isn't the first. In 2001, the family of a 5-year-old Massachusetts girl with the disease left the Catholic church after being denied permission to use a rice wafer. Some Catholic churches allow no-gluten hosts, while others do not, said Elaine Monarch, executive director of the Celiac Disease Foundation, a California-based support group for sufferers. "It is an undue hardship on a person who wants to practice their religion and needs to compromise their health to do so," Monarch said.

The church has similar rules for Communion wine. For alcoholics, the church allows a substitute for wine under some circumstances, however the drink must still be fermented from grapes and contain some alcohol. Grape juice is not a valid substitute. Haley, a shy, brown-haired tomboy who loves surfing and hates wearing dresses, realizes the consequences of taking a wheat wafer. "I'm on a gluten-free diet because I can't have wheat. I could die," she said last week. Last year, as the third grader approached Holy Communion age in this Jersey Shore town, her mother told officials at St. Denis Catholic Church in Manasquan that the girl could not have the standard host.

After the church's pastor refused to allow a substitute, a priest at a nearby parish volunteered to offer one, and in May, Haley wore a white Communion dress, and received the sacrament alongside her mother, who had not taken Communion since she herself was diagnosed with the disease. Last month, the diocese told the priest that the church would not validate Haley's sacrament because of the substitute wafer. "I struggled with telling her that the sacrament did not happen," said Pelly-Waldman. "She lives in a world of rules. She says 'Mommy, do we want to break a rule? Are we breaking a rule?'"

Pelly-Waldman is seeking help from the Pope and has written to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, challenging the church's policy. "This is a church rule, not God's will, and it can easily be adjusted to meet the needs of the people, while staying true to the traditions of our faith," Pelly-Waldman wrote in the letter.

Pelly-Waldman — who is still attending Mass every Sunday with her four children — said she is not out to bash the church, just to change the policy that affects her daughter. "I'm hopeful. Do I think it will be a long road to change? Yes. But I'm raising an awareness and I'm taking it one step at a time," she said. -USA Today 8-20-2004


The problem arises here with this simple fact. Rome says...

"If anyone denies that in the sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist (communion wafer) are contained truly, really and substantially the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ, but says that He is in it only as a sign, or figure or force, let him be anathema." (An exhausted definition of "Anathema" = To be damned and put to death) p.79, Canon 1

By the consecration the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ is brought about. Under the consecrated species of bread and wine Christ himself, living and glorious, is present in a true, real, and substantial mannerhis Body and his Blood, with his soul and his divinity (cf. Council of Trent: DS 1640; 1651). From the Catechism of the Catholic Church.1413

According to Rome, when that bread changes it is Jesus Christ incarnate! So, if it really changes, why is it the girl can not take the host? According to Roman theology the Wheat is gone! So she should have no problems. However, she does have problems. This proves the Wheat is still in that bread and Rome lied once again!

And all it took was for the Lord to allow a little 8 year old child to be allergic to gluten!


ROME CLAIMS EUCHARIST WILL BRING PEACE

MEXICO CITY, SEPT. 15, 2004 (Zenit.org).- Mexico's bishops think the upcoming International Eucharistic Congress in Guadalajara will be a great opportunity for the Church to reflect profoundly on the Blessed Sacrament and to foster world peace

The bishops expressed this in a press statement published Monday, in which they highlighted the most important moments of the Oct. 10-17 event, convoked by John Paul II. The theme of the congress is "The Eucharist: Light and Life of the New Millennium." 

"This event will be a great opportunity to reflect profoundly and to meditate on the Eucharistic Mystery, in order to foster in the world peace, reconciliation and justice -- fruits among others of the new evangelization -- and to give to the whole of humanity the necessary food, Jesus Christ, to address the challenges of the new millennium," the bishops explained in the statement. 

The text is signed by Bishop José Guadalupe Martín Rábago of Leon, and Bishop Carlos Aguiar Retes of Texcoco, president and secretary, respectively, of the episcopal conference. 

The 
congress will be preceded by an international theological/pastoral symposium on the Eucharist, Oct. 6-8, at the Valle de Atemajac University. - Zenit Article #ZE04091520

You know what this means don't you? Just a few hundreds years ago Rome did this very same thing. And in order for "world peace" to be realized, ALL peoples must proclaim the Eucharistic wafer to be Jesus Christ INCARNATE! And if you failed to do so, Foxes book of Martyrs records at least 500,000,000 souls were burned at the stake, buried alive, boiled in oil, cut in half, and a hostr of many other torturous acts!

(Found following info on this site: http://www.remnantofgod.org/RomanIRS.htmAs many of you are aware, this ministry has been preaching for some time now that the ONE WORLD CHURCH of the Roman Beast was going to figure out a way to get ALL churches to go along with her Satanic agenda. I have shared numerous facts proving the prophecy of the Lord is 100% certain in every respect. For those of you seeking a review of these particular facts, see these Newsletters in the Truth Provided Newsletter archives. You can access it in the “Current” section of the website menu.

For many years the elect have known of this satanic agenda. That’s one of the main reasons the Devil hates the “Remnant of her seed” in Revelation 12:17 so much. We UNDERSTAND PROPHECY and we are not quite about it.  That is also why this small gathering of faithful have become the target of Rome. The Vatican will use everything from propaganda that states the only true Church of Jesus Christ on Earth is a cult, to out and out death threats against those of us that do preach this truth. You can review some of the facts I refer to in these newsletters. (Some of the Newsletters have been escalated to actual web pages due to increased activity)

The Vatican in Rome has been solely responsible for allowing Satan to direct it's every move in the last day agenda we see unfolding right before our very eyes. Everywhere you turn you see evidence of Rome "suggesting" to the Christian world its definition of Christian doctrine. Even if it means to deny Biblical jurisprudence! They do this subliminally now! Whenever you see a disaster reported on the News media you see the cameraman making special care to zoom in on those people making the Roman sign of the cross of Baal upon their bodies. Priests appear on sitcom after sitcom as the norm for "Christian" suggestions in times of sadness as well as joy. TV ministers have Catholic priests on the platform as they preach. Pagan Catholic rituals are honored by almost every person alive in church as well as home, work and play. The media as well as every Catholic and non-Catholic alike use the term "Holy father" when speaking of the Pope regardless of the fact that it is a blasphemous title. Jesus Himself used that term FOR HIS HEAVENLY FATHER in John chapter 17. Christmas, Lent, Easter. Halloween as well as numerous other pagan high days are openly embraced WITHOUT SHAME mind you by almost every Christian alive as the norm in celebration. Rome has literally taken over! They have wooed the Christian churches with their “convenient” and Pagan ways the world over, and as is always the case, when it is gradually brought upon the church, it become acceptable simply because if sheer repartition, and at the same time those that are fighting against it simply give up because they feel the battle can never be won.

Fact is folks, this satanic agenda was manufactured for the end result we have all been awaiting as true Christians. It is no longer considered un-Christ like when a so called Protestant embraces the teachings of the Vatican as true Christian doctrine. Everything from the so called immortal soul doctrines to the lie about a secret rapture and a seven year trib is accepted by all. Why is this? Slowly but surely the Whore of Babylon has been chipping away at the hearts of all Christendom. We have all been so used to doing things our parents taught us, and their parents taught them, that many of us just trust that it's safe Christian activities, practices, or doctrines. However, it is still possible to open a Bible and find the truth, and in so doing many do leave the errors of Rome. Yet again, we see the Roman Beast has been trying to cover that possibility as well. The Vatican has been instrumental in re-writing the Word of God to such an extent that we actually see history repeating itself in regards to the arrival of Messiah. We see the believers of this world looking to the return of Christ in the very same error filled manner the believers of 2000 years ago did. What am I talking about?

Many of you that receive my newsletters or listen to my broadcasts are aware of my "Bogus Bible" page. In it you will see two major Bible versions exposed as altered by Roman Theologin's. There are many more than just "two" versions altered of course.  I just chose to expose the NIV and NASB on that page simply because of their popularity. All the people that read and trust these altered Bibles are allowing Satan to do to them that he did to the Pharisee's 2000 years ago. Back then, the Pharisee's misunderstood the prophecies of our Lord's arrival as Messiah. They thought Messiah was to arrive and take over the Roman Government and bring peace to the Jewish nation and rule on Earth from Jerusalem. This is the main reason Herod had all the babies killed that were born around the time Christ was born.

I like the way Ellen White describes what went down that day. She says,


Soldiers were at once sent to Bethlehem, with orders to put to death all the children of two years and under. The quiet homes of the city of David witnessed those scenes of horror that, six hundred years before, had been opened to the prophet. "In Ramah was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not."

 This calamity the Jews had brought upon themselves. If they had been walking in faithfulness and humility before God, He would in a signal manner have made the wrath of the king harmless to them. But they had separated themselves from God by their sins, and had rejected the Holy Spirit, which was their only shield. They had not studied the Scriptures with a desire to conform to the will of God. They had searched for prophecies which could be interpreted to exalt themselves, and to show how God despised all other nations. It was their proud boast that the Messiah was to come as a king, conquering His enemies, and treading down the heathen in His wrath. Thus they had excited the hatred of their rulers. Through their misrepresentation of Christ's mission, Satan had purposed to compass the destruction of the Saviour; but instead of this, it returned upon their own heads.  -Desire of Ages 65,66


Herod believed that this one he called "King of the Jews" was a threat to his rule. So, he used his powers to try and prevent His arrival. IT IS HAPPENING AGAIN TODAY!!!

In today's world you have a large amount of people claiming to be Christians preaching that when Jesus arrives HE WILL REIGN ON EARTH 1000 YEARS AND TAKE OVER ALL THE GOVERNMENTS TO BRING PEACE. Why do they believe this easy to expose lie? Because they are holding a bogus bible in their hands THINKING it is the Word of God. And at the same time they are listening to their Roman taught preachers twisting the Truth so as to tickle their ears. On my "1000 years" page I share the Biblical FACTS about where we will be before, during, and after the 1000 years prophecy speaks of. But if you look at that page with an NIV, NASB, or RSV Bible, you will find numerous verses appear to be either missing or re-written. I use the KJV Bible for a reason folks. Not only is it the only Bible that matches up with the Dead Sea Scrolls, it is also the Bible Rome hates with a passion. In fact I have a copy of the original preface of the King James bible on my site in the Warnings section of the website. It speaks of the Popes of Rome in a way that no doubt angers them. Is it any wonder the new versions of the KJV Bible never carry that preface?

The agenda of Satan is easily known my friends if you just look at his past actions. Two thousand years ago he needed to get the government in such a place that would allow him to attack Jesus Christ personally. Even the Jews were used by Satan in a major way to get the government involved. And now we see this happening today. It appears everyone is believing now that when Jesus comes He will take over the governments of this world and put an end to their evil rule, and then reign on Earth 1000 years. And regardless of the fact that this is a false prophetic utterance, the government doesn't like that idea at all! You see, the government can’t decipher prophecy either!

The error filled preachers and teachers are doing the exact same thing the Pharisee's did. They are getting the men in power to look upon this second coming of Christ as a major threat to them. And in their rage filled fervor of activity, they are making plans to STOP any and all preaching's, teachings, and conversations of same.

Since the devil has been so successful in getting ALL the religions into a massive group hug by using the Pope of today, he can now use this ecumenical movement to his advantage. In the first newsletter I mentioned earlier entitle "United State Church of America," you will find that the Vatican has been VERY busy behind closed doors making sure "certain laws" were being lobbied and passed that would directly effect every single Christian the world over.

I received an article quite a while back that will no doubt shock many of you to the core! Hopefully this will also awaken many of you out of a spiritual slumber. This article proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are indeed on the very threshold of the enforcement of the MARK OF THE BEAST.

In "The Trumpet Vol 9, Issue 6 Nov/Dec 2001" publication it is stated, "The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today, that specializes in keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service, is now boldly saying to the pastors of America that they not only have to be "ordained by God, but also the IRS."

That's right, the UNITED STATES CHURCH OF AMERICA seems to have officially opened for business! In this article by Dr Greg J. Dixon it is reported that in order to be able to keep your 501C3 tax free status as a church. You not only have to AGREE that all other churches INCLUDING NON-CHRISTIAN CHURCHES are equal to yours in every way. But you must also agree to teach and embrace the SACRAMENTS OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC VATICAN as Christian requirements in order to receive tax free status.

Before getting to the article, let me say this. In it you will see just how the Roman Catholic Church has not only infiltrated, but has taken complete control of the IRS. This has been done for the sole purpose of stopping the mouths of those churches that will not go along with the Vatican in Rome. The government of the USA is showing the birth pangs of Herodian theology here. They are running scared "thinking" those twisted sermons and misunderstood prophecies of all those bogus Bible preachers are true. They think Jesus is coming to "reign on Earth" and take away their ability to bilk billions out of your pockets on a weekly basis. So, they are making plans just like Herod in his day to ensure their reign goes undisturbed. And we owe it all to those preachers, pastors, priests, ministers, and lay people grasping the bogus Bibles of the Roman Catholic printing presses.  Our own religious leaders have given Satan a major opportunity to seal the fates of billions by their UNinspired sermons. I honestly believe this is one major method the beast in Rome will use to enforce its mark in the very near future. Many churches will no doubt fall for this ploy of Rome and go along with the Roman IRS and sign away their religious freedoms so as to "stay in the business" of making money. That’s what happens when preachers look at their ministerial duties as a CAREER, instead of a CALLING! However, there ARE those that will not go along. The article is a detailed description of one small church that did just that.

As for those that do go along with the Vatican sanctioned IRS requirements. Are you wondering how these so called Christian preachers see no wrong in yoking with unbelievers? Well it has to do with some major religious leaders that have been recorded declaring JESUS IS NO LONGER NECESSARY to gain Heaven. I did a radio broadcast about that back on February 29, 2004. For the documented facts, read the next three newsletters I wrote some time back...

Or you can just go to my “Rome says Jesus not needed” page in the RCC Exposed section of the website. I cover all of it there.

By the way, please pray for those church leaders that have started churches and have gone the unbiblical route of incorporating their churches as a business to receive the "TAX FREE" status of the 501C3. Those churches will soon be attacked by the IRS and forced into signing away their religious freedoms so as to go along with ROME. And those that don't, will have their tax free status removed immediately, which by the way will be retroactive as well. That means if they were a church 20 years with tax free status, then they owe those back taxes PLUS PENALTIES AND INTEREST! That amounts to MILLIONS and that will effectively shut them down as well as put the Pastors and board members in financial disaster status immediately. And you don’t have to be a huge church for it to mushroom. We all know how the IRS compounds interest and how they multiply their penalties in massive amounts. 20 years worth of penalties. Interest, and back taxes, not to mention the special excise taxes for getting “caught” as the IRS will put it, even small churches will be hit with such a sum that will effectively wipe them out.

Please, I implore you to read the ENTIRE article! There are many twists and turns within it! You WILL be shocked!


 THE TRUMPET vol. IX - Issue 6   NOV/DEC 2001
http://indianapolisbaptisttemple.com/trumpet/archives/nov2001/irs.html

Internal Revenue Service: PASTORS MUST BE ORDAINED BY THE IRS
by Dr. Greg J. Dixon

The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today, that specializes in keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service, is now boldly saying to the pastors of America that they not only have to be "ordained by God, but also the IRS."

They also say that the IRS is dictating terms to the churches by declaring in clear and no uncertain terms that, "
The government doesn't want your Bible, they want your checkbook!" In seminars all over the US, Chitwood and Chitwood of Chattanooga, Tennessee, is repeating this startling announcement to pastors and church leaders. Without so much as a blush, Michael Chitwood, the main speaker, says, besides the above quotes, "Pastor, if you don't get your house in order, get ready, you are going to have a jail ministry" as he practically screams out to those present as to what pastors and church leaders must do to avoid jail time and the confiscation of church property by the federal government.

Sounds like a nice guy eh? Please understand the Government must have a bold and intimidating character at the forefront of a department such as this. So expect this kind of boisterous talk. Like the huge Roman columns in Washington, this is done to intimidate. Nothing more, nothing less.

Besides giving the pastor his job description, which is based on the Roman Catholic model of worship and polity, the IRS is demanding many other things that are clearly designed to make the IRS Commissioner the new head of the churches in America. Some of these demands are as follows:

  • The church must collect a Federal ID (Social Security) number from visiting evangelists, missionaries, preachers and singers before they invite them to the pulpit.
  • They must give a Form 1099 to any minister who receives up to $600 in a years time, which includes missionary support.
  • If the ID is not received, the church leaders must withhold a jeopardy assessment of 39% on the spot and send it to the IRS.
  • They must agree to the IRS definition of benevolence.
  • They cannot deal in cash at any level, but must deposit all offerings into a checking account and write checks for every purpose.
  • This means, of course, that the church, in order to conduct its ministry, has to have an Employer Identification Number which must be provided by the IRS by filing Form SS-4 which a true New Testament church could never do and remain obedient to her Lord. In fact, church leaders would have to misrepresent the church as a religious organization rather than a N.T. Church to do so.
  • Other things that pastors and church leaders are required to do are to be an informer against their members and also to preach only IRS prescribed sermons. 

    Also, all fund raising material must be submitted to the IRS for their approval. 

The job description for pastors is a list of nine specific sacerdotal duties which again is a Roman Catholic definition meaning sacred.

Understand, the IRS is the one using these Roman Catholic terms in their definitions of job description duties of pastors. This word, “sacerdotal” alone should cause a red flag to spring up in true Christian preachers the world over. But seeing how Rome has been busy infiltrating their churches, as well as educational institutions that graduate thousands of student ministers annually, they simply don’t see the tell tale signs of the Roman church.

The Catholic church teaches that these sacraments, when administered by a priest, are essential to ones salvation. This is totally opposite to the Bible definition which states that baptism and communion are memorials of the death, burial and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and that they follow salvation. The nine duties (that the IRS imposes) are:

1.      Baptisms

2.      Weddings

3.      Serving the Eucharist (the Catholic sacrament of communion)

4.      Teaching

5.      Spiritual counseling

6.      Christenings

7.      Baby dedications

8.      Administration of church affairs

9.      Regular conducting of worship services.

Before moving on. Again the IRS is using Latin, or Roman Catholic terminology here. The word “Eucharist” is native to Roman Catholic Baal worship. It’s the title that preaches a solar disk shaped piece of bread is truly the body and blood of Jesus Christ. That theology started first in Babylon when they would make small wafers shaped like the Sun to be eaten as food and considered truly to be Baal incarnate. Even the etching of the Sun on one side, and the initials IHS (for Isis, Horus, and Seb) on the Pagan wafer are also seen on the Roman Catholic wafer!

The article continues…

If the pastor does a substantial number of these things, he will receive very lucrative tax breaks. This is in clear violation of the scriptures concerning the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes which the Lord Jesus said that He hates (Rev. 2:6, 2:15). It is the setting up of a privileged class of clergy with benefits from the state that lay members do not receive. Others who minister to the church in the area of music, youth, children, education and other areas of responsibility don't qualify.

This is consistent with what officials of the IRS told Attorney David Gibbs of the Christian Law Association (CLA) in 1984 when they said that their definition of church is "once per week adult worship." They said that they did not consider such ministries as Sunday school, Christian school, busses, youth camp, vacation Bible school, nursing home, etc., to fall within their definition of the word "church". This Gibbs/IRS meeting took place in Washington, DC at the time that the so called champion of Christian liberty was hammering out a compromise with the Dole Committee (Sen. Bob Dole-R-Kansas) in the US Senate to bring the churches into compliance with the FICA tax (social security) laws. This was the deal that would eventually cause the raid and seizure of the Baptist Temple 17 years later. It's too bad that Gibbs didn't sound the alarm at that time and call the Bible believing pastors together for a summit meeting to map out a strategy that could have possibly saved our churches and ministries. The unregistered church pastors tried, but unfortunately our words fell on deaf ears. The so called "big" preachers were too busy receiving their tax deductible gifts and building their empires to be concerned over the future of God's work. Now the enemies of Christ have sprung the trap and it is too late. 

These requirements should be intolerable enough by just the fact that the IRS would even dare to suggest duties for pastors, but to impose under the penalty of imprisonment and confiscation of property the same responsibilities of Roman Catholic priests is nothing short of naked tyranny. Obviously, the inquisition has returned and the pastors and churches of America are not even aware that it has arrived. The raid and seizure of the property of the Baptist Temple is the direct result of the pastors and church refusing to bow down to this new wave of Catholic terror that has come upon our land. The issue in the Baptist Temple case isn't taxes as the IRS, with the help of the media, has led the people of Indianapolis and nation to believe. The issue is very simple. Will the churches of America bow down to the IRS in violation of the first commandment, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me," or will they bow down to the Lord Jesus Christ? Our Lord said, "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon" (Matthew 6:24). The purge is now on as we hear of churches and ministries being closed on a regular basis. But there is still no evidence that the pastors have awakened from their stupor.

And I don’t expect they will soon either. Just like they clammed up when Roe –vs- Wade was pushing their agenda. They clammed up when the Homosexuals in Canada decided to seek laws to have preachers jailed for using Bibles to help warn them. They clammed up when Rome was caught molesting thousands of their own children! They clammed up when laws were passed allowing thousands of pedophiles to be released into the community as regular citizens! And they’re even clamming up now when Rome’s homosexual agenda is being enacted in California! So don’t expect the so called Religious leaders to do thing one people! Look at them on the TV and see how they love their Armani suits, their Gucci shoes, their Rolex watches, their Mercedes Benz, and their million dollar mansions. Do you actually think they will say STOP PERSECUTING THOSE CHRISTIANS to the IRS? If they do ALL their tax rewards will not only disappear, they will also have to deal with the back taxes and penalties to boot! Truth is folks! THEY ARE HIRELINGS! They don’t love the flock! They run off at the first sign of danger!

The benevolent requirements for churches are beyond atrocious. They are five in number:

  • Food
  • Clothing
  • Housing
  • Medical emergencies
  • and Utilities

The church cannot help with transportation or auto repairs and a myriad of other things that churches have historically done on a regular basis. The church cannot make loans to the pastor, members, or others which churches have always done. Obviously, they want to make sure that the money lenders get their profits even from the poor. Can you imagine the government of the US limiting a church as to its duties in regarding charitable activity? There is no subject in the Bible that is nearer to the heart of God than charity. According to the apostle James, it is the test of pure religion (James 1:27). Paul the Apostle declares that charity is of higher value even than preaching and sacrifice (I Cor. 13:1-3). For the churches to debase such a high and noble service to Christ by submitting its administration to the wicked IRS is beyond belief. How will the preachers of America give an account of caving into this coercion by an abusive Bush administration who is continuing with the policies of those before him? How will church leaders face the Lord Jesus at the Judgment Seat of Christ when He asks them why they violated His clear commands concerning alms giving? He said, "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men, Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly." But now the churches are required to get the permission of the IRS before helping someone other than in the manner and purpose that they approve. Then records will have to be kept for the IRS so that the publicans can make sure that the church is in fact following their guidelines. And, of course, they expect church leaders to report this alms giving to the IRS so that they can even gouge the poor for more tribute. And all of this so the churches can keep their tax exemption and the people can get their precious tax deductions for their tithes and gifts. As James Dobson's organization said when challenged, "It's just good stewardship." Thievery, good stewardship? How sad. 

It may be that the churches have now gone too far. When they begin building their dynasties on the backs of the poor our Lord, no doubt, will be swift in His removal of their candlestick. He said to the church at Ephesus, "Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works: or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent" (Rev. 2:5).

Now for the real strange stuff! What your about to learn now is very graphic, so be ready for it. If this doesn’t prove to you the Vatican has 100% over this situation, nothing will! Only a willfully blind person will miss these facts…

All Churches Now Required to Join IRS Super Church

Two other developments concerning IRS control of churches has risen recently that should literally send shock waves through the religious community. First, while the churches are arguing doctrinal positions among themselves, and won't even spit on each other for the most part, the IRS has now developed its own super church. Independent Baptists in particular pride themselves in their anti-ecumenism. No fundamentalist preacher worth his salt would be caught dead at the local church federation meeting where he has to rub shoulders with a charismatic or liberal preacher. However, they don't think twice about paying a large fee to go to a Chitwood or CLA seminar and sit next to one of these religious outcasts to learn how to be a good IRS approved church and pastor.

It is now a fact that in order to get and keep the tax-exempt status a church must agree that all religions are equal. The new Application for Recognition of Exemption Form 1023 Schedule A for Churches (Rev. September 1998) demands a declaration to this effect with the following words at point #3: "Does the organization require prospective members to renounce other religious beliefs or their membership in other churches or religious orders to become members? Yes__ No__. If "Yes," describe."

It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out where they are going with this. In order to be considered a legal church (tax exempt) in America, the church or religious organization will have to declare that all religions are equal. They will also have to declare that they do not believe that their doctrinal position only results in converts to their faith having eternal life. They must renounce this narrow inclusivist position. Maybe we now know why Billy Graham, Robert Schuller, Pat Robertson, and other TV preachers have been making such fuzzy remarks about adherents of other religions, though sincere, going to heaven without receiving Christ.

Again, I implore you to check out my February 29, 2004 Radio broadcast entitled, “Pope and others declare Jesus not needed!” I share documented statements that Billy Graham, Robert Shuller, Pope John Paul, and Cardinal Francis Arinze make concerning Jesus and salvation. And by the way, Cardinal Arinze is slated as the possible next Pope. He is the one spear heading the ecumenical charge for Rome.

 In that tax exemption is government subsidy, according to the Supreme Court in the Bob Jones University case, it is now clear that the US government will not support any religion that clings to the narrow minded belief that salvation is in Jesus Christ alone. Remember? "Come Shekels, Come Shackles." The world church isn't coming; it is already here, and the preachers don't have a clue as they go merrily along hand in hand with the Great Harlot to the wedding with the anti-Christ. (Rev. 17).

For more evidence regarding the One World church that officially started on June 26, 2000 and is headed up by none other then John Paul II, see my July 04, 2000 Newsletter entitled, The One World Church Officially Started. You will be shocked as to what’s next!

US Government Through the IRS Outlaws Preaching on Second Coming of Christ

One of the reasons the IRS gave to Texe Marr's Living Truth Ministries for removing their tax exempt status is as follows: "Much of the material you disseminate promises to address possible conspiracies or threats, either from individuals, groups or various agencies, against Christianity, freedom or other rights. This is evident from a review of your newsletters and order forms. The titles and promotional materials are designed to sensationalize and grab the readers attention. They usually imply that the works will expose certain prominent groups, individuals, politicians or government agencies as being part of or linked to some threat or conspiracy." One of the titles that the IRS gave as an example included "Bible Prophecy and The Conspiracy."

Any grade school child in Sunday School knows that you can't teach or write on Bible prophecy without dealing with the second coming of Jesus Christ. But just as the Russian pastors under communism were forbidden to speak on this subject, we are now coming to the same place in our beloved land. It is obvious that if one believes in the literal return of the Lord Jesus Christ that they will be considered a domestic terrorist. In that the Lord Jesus will destroy wicked government upon His return in great glory and break the back of Gentile world rule, this message isn't popular with the in-for-hells and the high-heeled-belles that run our country today. Of course, they don't believe that He is coming, but they believe that we who do will be involved in what they call self-fulfilled prophecies and try to hasten His coming by blowing up everything in sight. Further evidence of this type of anti-Christ thinking surfaced recently when a brochure put out by the FBI in Phoenix, Arizona, named "potential domestic terrorists" that law enforcement should be aware of. One of those groups is "Doomsday/Cult-Type." Obviously, this would include all Bible believing preachers and churches in America. We not only believe that there will be a literal doomsday, we believe that the Lord Jesus Christ will bring the doom when He comes (Rev. 6:12-17). It won't do any good to claim that your church is not a "cult". The IRS definition fits the average Bible believing church to a tee. 

It’s like I said earlier. The government doesn’t believe Jesus is coming back, but they do believe we believe it. And they also believe Christians are crazy enough to hasten His coming by attacking them. How insane is that? True Christians already know the prophecies WILL fulfill whether we try to get involved or not. The Lord is not a liar! With that said, were you aware that the Vatican itself doesn’t believe in the second coming? Not to long ago they too put out articles in the Italian press telling the people not to worry that the end was not near!

 

 

 POPE ASSURES ITALIANS THE END IS NOT YET NIGH.
To the dismay of Seven Day Adventist's... but to the relief of everyone else, the Pope has declared that the world is not about to end. -From 
The Times, 24 April 1998, by Richard Owen in Rome] 
http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword12i.htm 

 

 

Truth is…

  • 1 Thessalonians 5:3, "For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape."

So is it any wonder the Roman Catholic controlled IRS would have the same belief structure?

Many have asked if we can actually show them this in the law. Our answer is no, we can't because you won't find a specific law that says that you can't preach on the Second Coming of Jesus Christ in America today. That's because they don't have to write a law to gain the same effect. All Congress has to do is to give an outlaw agency like the IRS a carte blanche privilege of making up their own so-called laws as they go along. The churches agreed to this when they signed their tax-exempt contract. They said that they would obey all laws, federal, state and local, presently and in the future. But they apparently didn't read the fine print. The new churches filing for tax exemption must agree to the following: "The Corporation or organization shall have no power to take any action that would be required for a tax exemption under Internal Revenue  Code Section 501(c)(3) and related regulations, rulings, and procedures." It is now the "procedure" of the IRS to refuse tax exempt status to those churches that will not agree that all religions are equal and who refuse to join through tax exemption, the world church. Also, preaching on Christ's coming is taboo.

For those churches which are foolish enough to believe that Sec. 508 of the IRS code allows an automatic exemption for churches, need to read it again. It doesn't say "exemption," it says, "...churches have a mandatory exception." The exception is from filing a Form 1023 to make application for not for profit status. Here is the kicker. Churches have to abide by the same rules that those that do file for this privilege. And if they do not, the IRS can, and most assuredly will, remove their tax exemption. The only thing missing is the annual Form 990 that other religious organizations have to file. When this is required, the churches will be under total control of the IRS with no wiggle room.

In the Baptist Temple court case, the church learned that a New Testament Church does not legally exist in the US today because there are no longer any First Amendment protections left. The genius of the First Amendment and various religious freedom clauses of the fifty states is that, for the first time in history, a N. T. Church could exist legally without having in the words of the IRS a "distinct legal existence." Now even a N.T. Church will be assigned by force the legal status of an association and will be expected to meet the same standards that the not for profits have to meet. But, they still won't have their God given right of a non-taxable status. This status is in contrast to an exempt status which is a privilege not a right.

IRS Agent Says That Churches are Trapped

The evidence as to what we are saying, though denied by most preachers, was made clear on January 24 this year in Tampa, Florida. IRS agent Melvin Blough testified in federal court that "once a church obtains the status of 501(c)(3) under the IRC they are trapped. The only way to be removed from a 501(c)(3) status is if the IRS chooses to remove the exemption. So if you dissolve the corporation and continue on as ABC church, an unincorporated church, you're still trapped in their web and under their control." He further testified that a church is automatically exempt under federal law without a 501(c)(3) designation. He also stated under oath that churches request the status just to get the governments stamp of approval. Even though Blough used the word "exemption" rather than "exception," he is essentially correct in his assessment of the plight of the churches of America. It is obvious that, regardless, the result is the same.

For more information on how to pastor a N.T. Church contact 
The Trumpet.

Nuff said?

Comments